[PATCH 10/13] dt-bindings: spi: add bindings for microchip mpfs spi

[Conor.Dooley at microchip.com]

On 09/11/2021 12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 09/11/2021 13:16, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>> On 09/11/2021 04:06, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:05:51 +0000, conor.dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add device tree bindings for the {q,}spi controller on
>>>> the Microchip PolarFire SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../bindings/spi/microchip,mpfs-spi.yaml      | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/microchip,mpfs-spi.yaml
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/microchip,mpfs-spi.example.dts:19:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h: No such file or directory
>>>      19 |         #include "dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h"
>> Rob,
>> Should I drop the header from the example or is there a way for me
>> specify the dependent patch to pass this check?
> 
> The error has to be fixed, although not necessarily by dropping the
> header, but by posting it. How this can pass on your system? There is no
> such file added in this patchset.
I linked the patch adding the clock as a dependency in the cover letter 
[1], which is why I was wondering if there was a better way to do so 
that would get picked up by the checker bot.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210818141102.36655-2-daire.mcnamara@microchip.com/
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>