[PATCH V7] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
Aurelien Jarno
aurelien at aurel32.net
Sat Nov 6 05:11:51 PDT 2021
On 2021-11-05 17:47, guoren at kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
>
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
>
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
>
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
>
> Fixes: bb0fed1c60cc ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow")
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent at gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent at gmail.com>
Thanks for this patch. From what I understand, it fixes among other
things the possibility to read the DA9063 RTC more than once.
Does it means that we could now enable it in the device tree? I mean
something like the following patch that unfortunately I can't test now:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
index 2e4ea84f27e7..c357b48582f7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ pmic at 58 {
interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
interrupt-controller;
+ onkey {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-onkey";
+ };
+
regulators {
vdd_bcore1: bcore1 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
@@ -205,6 +209,14 @@ vdd_ldo11: ldo11 {
regulator-always-on;
};
};
+
+ rtc {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-rtc";
+ };
+
+ wdt {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-watchdog";
+ };
};
};
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien at aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list