[PATCH v3 4/4] riscv: Convert custom spinlock/rwlock to generic qspinlock/qrwlock

Guo Ren guoren at kernel.org
Thu Mar 25 11:52:55 GMT 2021


diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 5ca41152cf4b..894e170c503e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -17,6 +17,14 @@
 #define __local_release_fence()
         \
        __asm__ __volatile__(RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory")

+#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
+#define __ASM_SLLIW "slli\t"
+#define __ASM_SRLIW "srli\t"
+#else
+#define __ASM_SLLIW "slliw\t"
+#define __ASM_SRLIW "srliw\t"
+#endif
+
 #define __xchg_relaxed(ptr, new, size)                                 \
 ({                                                                     \
        __typeof__(ptr) __ptr = (ptr);                                  \
@@ -31,14 +39,14 @@
                        __asm__ __volatile__ (                          \
                        "0:     lr.w    %0, (%4)        \n"             \
                        "       mv      %1, %0          \n"             \
-                       "       slliw   %1, %1, 16      \n"             \
-                       "       srliw   %1, %1, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SLLIW    "%1, %1, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SRLIW    "%1, %1, 16      \n"             \
                        "       mv      %2, %3          \n"             \
-                       "       slliw   %2, %2, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SLLIW    "%2, %2, 16      \n"             \
                        "       or      %1, %2, %1      \n"             \
                        "       sc.w    %2, %1, (%4)    \n"             \
                        "       bnez    %2, 0b          \n"             \
-                       "       srliw   %0, %0, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SRLIW    "%0, %0, 16      \n"             \
                        : "=&r" (__ret), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (__rc)      \
                        : "r" (__new), "r"(addr)                        \
                        : "memory");                                    \
@@ -46,14 +54,14 @@
                        __asm__ __volatile__ (                          \
                        "0:     lr.w    %0, (%4)        \n"             \
                        "       mv      %1, %0          \n"             \
-                       "       srliw   %1, %1, 16      \n"             \
-                       "       slliw   %1, %1, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SRLIW    "%1, %1, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SLLIW    "%1, %1, 16      \n"             \
                        "       mv      %2, %3          \n"             \
                        "       or      %1, %2, %1      \n"             \
                        "       sc.w    %2, %1, 0(%4)   \n"             \
                        "       bnez    %2, 0b          \n"             \
-                       "       slliw   %0, %0, 16      \n"             \
-                       "       srliw   %0, %0, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SLLIW    "%0, %0, 16      \n"             \
+                       __ASM_SRLIW    "%0, %0, 16      \n"             \
                        : "=&r" (__ret), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (__rc)      \
                        : "r" (__new), "r"(addr)                        \
                        : "memory");                                    \

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:34 PM Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> haha, I forgot RV32, it needs a
>
> #ifdef RV32
>     srliw
> #else
>     srli
> #endif
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:16 PM kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
> > [also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.12-rc4 next-20210325]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/guoren-kernel-org/riscv-Add-qspinlock-qrwlock/20210325-155933
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 5965a7adbd72dd9b288c0911cb73719fed1efa08
> > config: riscv-rv32_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/2bf2d117ab34b007089e20e1c46eff89b5da097e
> >         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> >         git fetch --no-tags linux-review guoren-kernel-org/riscv-Add-qspinlock-qrwlock/20210325-155933
> >         git checkout 2bf2d117ab34b007089e20e1c46eff89b5da097e
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c: Assembler messages:
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:184: Error: unrecognized opcode `srliw t1,t1,16'
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:185: Error: unrecognized opcode `slliw t1,t1,16'
> > >> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:190: Error: unrecognized opcode `slliw a6,a6,16'
> > >> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:191: Error: unrecognized opcode `srliw a6,a6,16'
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:184: Error: unrecognized opcode `slliw t1,t1,16'
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:185: Error: unrecognized opcode `srliw t1,t1,16'
> >    kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:187: Error: unrecognized opcode `slliw t3,t3,16'
> > >> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:191: Error: unrecognized opcode `srliw a6,a6,16'
> >
> >
> > vim +190 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> >
> > 69f9cae90907e0 Peter Zijlstra (Intel  2015-04-24  187)
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  188  /**
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  189   * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26 @190   * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26 @191   *
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  192   * *,1,* -> *,0,*
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  193   */
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  194  static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  195  {
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  196   atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  197  }
> > 59fb586b4a07b4 Will Deacon            2018-04-26  198
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>  Guo Ren
>
> ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list