[PATCH] Insert SFENCE.VMA in function set_pte_at for RISCV

Anup Patel anup at brainfault.org
Tue Mar 16 08:40:40 GMT 2021


On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:59 PM Andrew Waterman
<waterman at eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:32 AM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:27 PM Jiuyang Liu <liu at jiuyang.me> wrote:
> > >
> > > > As per my understanding, we don't need to explicitly invalidate local TLB
> > > > in set_pte() or set_pet_at() because generic Linux page table management
> > > > (<linux>/mm/*) will call the appropriate flush_tlb_xyz() function after page
> > > > table updates.
> > >
> > > I witnessed this bug in our micro-architecture: set_pte instruction is
> > > still in the store buffer, no functions are inserting SFENCE.VMA in
> > > the stack below, so TLB cannot witness this modification.
> > > Here is my call stack:
> > > set_pte
> > > set_pte_at
> > > map_vm_area
> > > __vmalloc_area_node
> > > __vmalloc_node_range
> > > __vmalloc_node
> > > __vmalloc_node_flags
> > > vzalloc
> > > n_tty_open
> > >
> > > I think this is an architecture specific code, so <linux>/mm/* should
> > > not be modified.
> > > And spec requires SFENCE.VMA to be inserted on each modification to
> > > TLB. So I added code here.
> >
> > The generic linux/mm/* already calls the appropriate tlb_flush_xyz()
> > function defined in arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> >
> > Better to have a write-barrier in set_pte().
> >
> > >
> > > > Also, just local TLB flush is generally not sufficient because
> > > > a lot of page tables will be used across on multiple HARTs.
> > >
> > > Yes, this is the biggest issue, in RISC-V Volume 2, Privileged Spec v.
> > > 20190608 page 67 gave a solution:
> >
> > This is not an issue with RISC-V privilege spec rather it is more about
> > placing RISC-V fences at right locations.
> >
> > > Consequently, other harts must be notified separately when the
> > > memory-management data structures have been modified. One approach is
> > > to use
> > > 1) a local data fence to ensure local writes are visible globally,
> > > then 2) an interprocessor interrupt to the other thread,
> > > then 3) a local SFENCE.VMA in the interrupt handler of the remote thread,
> > > and finally 4) signal back to originating thread that operation is
> > > complete. This is, of course, the RISC-V analog to a TLB shootdown.
> >
> > I would suggest trying approach#1.
> >
> > You can include "asm/barrier.h" here and use wmb() or __smp_wmb()
> > in-place of local TLB flush.
>
> wmb() doesn't suffice to order older stores before younger page-table
> walks, so that might hide the problem without actually fixing it.

If we assume page-table walks as reads then mb() might be more
suitable in this case ??

ARM64 also has an explicit barrier in set_pte() implementation. They are
doing "dsb(ishst); isb()" which is an inner-shareable store barrier followed
by an instruction barrier.

>
> Based upon Jiuyang's description, it does sound plausible that we are
> missing an SFENCE.VMA (or TLB shootdown) somewhere.  But I don't
> understand the situation well enough to know where that might be, or
> what the best fix is.

Yes, I agree but set_pte() doesn't seem to be the right place for TLB
shootdown based on set_pte() implementations of other architectures.

Regards,
Anup

>
>
> >
> > >
> > > In general, this patch didn't handle the G bit in PTE, kernel trap it
> > > to sbi_remote_sfence_vma. do you think I should use flush_tlb_all?
> > >
> > > Jiuyang
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > > void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > >                               pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > > {
> > >         unsigned long ext = 0;
> > >
> > >         if (addr < TASK_SIZE && pte_valid_user(pteval)) {
> > >                 if (!pte_special(pteval))
> > >                         __sync_icache_dcache(pteval);
> > >                 ext |= PTE_EXT_NG;
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         set_pte_ext(ptep, pteval, ext);
> > > }
> > >
> > > arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > >                               pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > > {
> > >
> > >         if (!pte_present(pteval))
> > >                 goto cache_sync_done;
> > >
> > >         if (pte_present(*ptep) && (pte_pfn(*ptep) == pte_pfn(pteval)))
> > >                 goto cache_sync_done;
> > >
> > >         __update_cache(addr, pteval);
> > > cache_sync_done:
> > >         set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, just local TLB flush is generally not sufficient because
> > > > a lot of page tables will be used accross on multiple HARTs.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:05 AM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +Alex
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:20 AM Jiuyang Liu <liu at jiuyang.me> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch inserts SFENCE.VMA after modifying PTE based on RISC-V
> > > > > specification.
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:
> > > > > 1. implement pte_user, pte_global and pte_leaf to check correspond
> > > > > attribute of a pte_t.
> > > >
> > > > Adding pte_user(), pte_global(), and pte_leaf() is fine.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. insert SFENCE.VMA in set_pte_at based on RISC-V Volume 2, Privileged
> > > > > Spec v. 20190608 page 66 and 67:
> > > > > If software modifies a non-leaf PTE, it should execute SFENCE.VMA with
> > > > > rs1=x0. If any PTE along the traversal path had its G bit set, rs2 must
> > > > > be x0; otherwise, rs2 should be set to the ASID for which the
> > > > > translation is being modified.
> > > > > If software modifies a leaf PTE, it should execute SFENCE.VMA with rs1
> > > > > set to a virtual address within the page. If any PTE along the traversal
> > > > > path had its G bit set, rs2 must be x0; otherwise, rs2 should be set to
> > > > > the ASID for which the translation is being modified.
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h:
> > > > > 1. implement get_current_asid to get current program asid.
> > > > > 2. implement local_flush_tlb_asid to flush tlb with asid.
> > > >
> > > > As per my understanding, we don't need to explicitly invalidate local TLB
> > > > in set_pte() or set_pet_at() because generic Linux page table management
> > > > (<linux>/mm/*) will call the appropriate flush_tlb_xyz() function after page
> > > > table updates. Also, just local TLB flush is generally not sufficient because
> > > > a lot of page tables will be used accross on multiple HARTs.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiuyang Liu <liu at jiuyang.me>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > > > index ebf817c1bdf4..5a47c60372c1 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > > > @@ -222,6 +222,16 @@ static inline int pte_write(pte_t pte)
> > > > >         return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_WRITE;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static inline int pte_user(pte_t pte)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_USER;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int pte_global(pte_t pte)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_GLOBAL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static inline int pte_exec(pte_t pte)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_EXEC;
> > > > > @@ -248,6 +258,11 @@ static inline int pte_special(pte_t pte)
> > > > >         return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_SPECIAL;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static inline int pte_leaf(pte_t pte)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       return pte_val(pte) & (_PAGE_READ | _PAGE_WRITE | _PAGE_EXEC);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  /* static inline pte_t pte_rdprotect(pte_t pte) */
> > > > >
> > > > >  static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
> > > > > @@ -358,6 +373,18 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > >                 flush_icache_pte(pteval);
> > > > >
> > > > >         set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       if (pte_present(pteval)) {
> > > > > +               if (pte_leaf(pteval)) {
> > > > > +                       local_flush_tlb_page(addr);
> > > > > +               } else {
> > > > > +                       if (pte_global(pteval))
> > > > > +                               local_flush_tlb_all();
> > > > > +                       else
> > > > > +                               local_flush_tlb_asid();
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               }
> > > > > +       }
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > >  static inline void pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > > > index 394cfbccdcd9..1f9b62b3670b 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > > > @@ -21,6 +21,18 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_page(unsigned long addr)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0" : : "r" (addr) : "memory");
> > > > >  }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline unsigned long get_current_asid(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       return (csr_read(CSR_SATP) >> SATP_ASID_SHIFT) & SATP_ASID_MASK;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_asid(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       unsigned long asid = get_current_asid();
> > > > > +       __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" : : "r" (asid) : "memory");
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  #else /* CONFIG_MMU */
> > > > >  #define local_flush_tlb_all()                  do { } while (0)
> > > > >  #define local_flush_tlb_page(addr)             do { } while (0)
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.30.2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > > > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Anup
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anup



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list