[PATCH] riscv: Fix 32-bit RISC-V boot failure

[Kefeng Wang]

On 2021/6/30 19:58, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:21 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2021/6/28 9:15, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:53 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi， sorry for the mistake，the bug is fixed by
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210602085517.127481-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
>>>> What are we on the patch you mentioned?
>>>>
>>>> I don't see it applied in the linux/master.
>>>>
>>>> Also there should be a "Fixes" tag and stable at vger.kernel.org cc'ed
>>>> because 32-bit is broken since v5.12.
>>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux/+/c9811e379b211c67ba29fb09d6f644dd44cfcff2
>>>
>>> it's on Palmer' riscv-next.
>> Not sure riscv-next is for which release? This is a regression and
>> should be on 5.13.
>>
>>> Hi Palmer, should I resend or could you help me to add the fixes tag?
> Your patch mixed 2 things (fix plus one feature) together, so it is
> not proper to back port your patch.

"mem=" will change the range of memblock, so the fix part must be included.


>
> Here is my 2 cents:
>
> 1. Drop your patch from riscv-next
> 2. Apply my patch as it is a simple fix to previous commit. This
> allows stable kernel to cherry-pick the fix to v5.12 and v5.13.
> 3. Rebase your patch against mine, and resend v2
>
> Let me know if this makes sense.

It is not a big problem for me, but I have no right abourt riscv-next,

let's wait Palmer's advise.

>
> Regards,
> Bin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv