[GIT PULL] RISC-V Patches for the 5.14 Merge Window, Part 1
Jisheng Zhang
jszhang3 at mail.ustc.edu.cn
Fri Jul 16 05:57:57 PDT 2021
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:11:14 +0200
Alex Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> Le 11/07/2021 à 20:45, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:58:10 PDT (-0700), alex at ghiti.fr wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 9/07/2021 à 16:53, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
> >>> The following changes since commit
> >>> 8a4102a0cf07cc76a18f373f6b49485258cc6af4:
> >>>
> >>> riscv: mm: Fix W+X mappings at boot (2021-06-01 21:15:09 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git
> >>> tags/riscv-for-linus-5.14-mw0
> >>>
> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 1958e5aef5098e28b7d6e6a2972649901ebecace:
> >>>
> >>> riscv: xip: Fix duplicate included asm/pgtable.h (2021-07-06
> >>> 16:17:40 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> RISC-V Patches for the 5.14 Merge Window, Part 1
> >>>
> >>> In addition to We have a handful of new features for 5.14:
> >>>
> >>> * Support for transparent huge pages.
> >>> * Support for generic PCI resources mapping.
> >>> * Support for the mem= kernel parameter.
> >>> * Support for KFENCE.
> >>> * A handful of fixes to avoid W+X mappings in the kernel.
> >>> * Support for VMAP_STACK based overflow detection.
> >>> * An optimized copy_{to,from}_user.
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> There are some Kconfig merge conflicts. They should be pretty
> >>> straight-forward, but we do have a symbol out of order -- I thought I
> >>> had a
> >>> script to check for that, but I guess it doesn't work. I just sent
> >>> out a patch
> >>> to fix it up.
> >>>
> >>> diff --cc arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>> index 3590eb76000e,469a70bd8da6..d36f3c5029fd
> >>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>> @@@ -60,12 -61,11 +61,12 @@@ config RISC
> >>> select GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL if MMU && 64BIT
> >>> select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> >>> - select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> >>> - select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN if MMU && 64BIT
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC if MMU && 64BIT
> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE if MMU && 64BIT
> >>> - select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB_QXFER_PKT
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
> >>> @@@ -81,11 -80,9 +82,14 @@@
> >>> select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
> >>> select HAVE_GENERIC_VDSO if MMU && 64BIT
> >>> select HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> >>> + select HAVE_KPROBES
> >>> + select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> >>> + select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> >>> + select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> + select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> + select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >>> + select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> >>> + select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> >>> select HAVE_PCI
> >>> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> >>> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
> >>> @@@ -108,7 -104,7 +112,8 @@@
> >>> select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> >>> select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
> >>> select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE if 64BIT && MMU
> >>> + select ZONE_DMA32 if 64BIT
> >>>
> >>> config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MIN
> >>> default 18 if 64BIT
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Akira Tsukamoto (1):
> >>> riscv: __asm_copy_to-from_user: Optimize unaligned memory
> >>> access and pipeline stall
> >>>
> >>> Alexandre Ghiti (6):
> >>> riscv: Remove CONFIG_PHYS_RAM_BASE_FIXED
> >>> riscv: Simplify xip and !xip kernel address conversion macros
> >>
> >> @Palmer: As said in the thread of this patchset multiple times, those 2
> >> patches should not be merged as it assumes that the base DRAM address is
> >> always 0x8000_0000 for all rv64 platforms: I don't think it is true,
> >> is it?
> >
> > Sorry, I remember saying something about that but must have missed the
> > resposeses. Do you have a pointer to the discussion? If this break
> > stuff I'm happy to revert it, which can be done post-rc1. I just need
> > to see what's actually broken first, because IIUC this was de-facto how
> > things worked already.
> >
>
> Really sorry about my response delay.
>
> The thing is that removing CONFIG_PHYS_RAM_BASE_FIXED defines
> CONFIG_PHYS_RAM_BASE to 0x8000_0000 for all rv64 chips, but I believe
> this is implementation specific: for now, this base address was passed
> into the device tree, and here it makes this value static.
>
> This issue with my patch was originally pointed by Jisheng, Geert and Arnd.
>
> If this is not a problem and you have a pointer to a document that
> specifies this, I would be very happy to have the link :)
>
> Thanks and again sorry about my response delay,
>
Hi Alex,
Since the PR has been merged into linux-5.14-rc1, directly reverting seems
not a good idea. IMHO, it's better to send patch(es) against current 5.14-rc1
tree. what do you think?
Thanks
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list