[PATCH 1/4] tools/perf/arch/riscv: record registers needed for --call-graph=dwarf
Edwin Török
edwin at etorok.net
Mon Jul 5 16:25:21 PDT 2021
For libdw-based callgraph sampling to work we need to sample registers.
Tested on HiFive Unmatched with a trunk version of OCaml:
```
# perf record --user-regs=?
available registers: pc ra sp gp tp t0 t1 t2 s0 s1 a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7
s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 s8 s9 s10 s11 t3 t4 t5 t6
# sed -e 's/(\*\*//' -e 's/\*\*)//' \
testsuite/tests/misc-unsafe/almabench.ml >almabench_benchmark.ml
# ocamlopt almabench_benchmark.ml -unsafe -o almabench_benchmark
# perf record -e cpu-clock -v --call-graph=dwarf -F 99 \
./almabench_benchmark
callchain: type DWARF
callchain: stack dump size 8192
nr_cblocks: 0
affinity: SYS
mmap flush: 1
comp level: 0
mmap size 528384B
mmap size 528384B
Control descriptor is not initialized
0 17.00 -26.06
1 12.34 1.29
2 6.83 22.95
3 0.04 -1.26
4 2.30 12.54
5 2.93 14.35
6 21.27 -16.57
7 20.41 -19.04
[ perf record: Woken up 65 times to write data ]
Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
Failed to open /proc/kcore.
Note /proc/kcore requires CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability to access.
Using /proc/kallsyms for symbols
failed to write feature CPUDESC
failed to write feature CPUID
failed to write feature NUMA_TOPOLOGY
failed to write feature MEM_TOPOLOGY
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 16.265 MB perf.data (1997 samples) ]
# perf script
...
almabench_bench 1193 14816.399235: 10101010 cpu-clock:
3fbbd63d54 reduce_sincos+0x268 (inlined)
3fbbd63d54 __cos+0x268 (/lib/libm-2.33.so)
2aac4b261b Almabench_benchmark.planetpv+0x25f
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4b3e03 Almabench_benchmark.entry+0x12bb
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4b0097 caml_program+0x143
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4e4e3d caml_start_program+0x71
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4e5409 caml_startup_common+0x18f
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4e5465 caml_startup_exn+0x9 (inlined)
2aac4e5465 caml_startup+0x9 (inlined)
2aac4e5465 caml_main+0x9
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
2aac4afe89 main+0x9
(/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
3fbbc47b0b __libc_start_main+0x85 (/lib/libc-2.33.so)
2aac4afebb _start+0x2b (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
```
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa at redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-perf-users at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Edwin Török <edwin at etorok.net>
---
tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
index 2864e2e3776d..8c9f511e8322 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,5 +2,37 @@
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+ SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_RISCV_PC),
+ SMPL_REG(ra, PERF_REG_RISCV_RA),
+ SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_RISCV_SP),
+ SMPL_REG(gp, PERF_REG_RISCV_GP),
+ SMPL_REG(tp, PERF_REG_RISCV_TP),
+ SMPL_REG(t0, PERF_REG_RISCV_T0),
+ SMPL_REG(t1, PERF_REG_RISCV_T1),
+ SMPL_REG(t2, PERF_REG_RISCV_T2),
+ SMPL_REG(s0, PERF_REG_RISCV_S0),
+ SMPL_REG(s1, PERF_REG_RISCV_S1),
+ SMPL_REG(a0, PERF_REG_RISCV_A0),
+ SMPL_REG(a1, PERF_REG_RISCV_A1),
+ SMPL_REG(a2, PERF_REG_RISCV_A2),
+ SMPL_REG(a3, PERF_REG_RISCV_A3),
+ SMPL_REG(a4, PERF_REG_RISCV_A4),
+ SMPL_REG(a5, PERF_REG_RISCV_A5),
+ SMPL_REG(a6, PERF_REG_RISCV_A6),
+ SMPL_REG(a7, PERF_REG_RISCV_A7),
+ SMPL_REG(s2, PERF_REG_RISCV_S2),
+ SMPL_REG(s3, PERF_REG_RISCV_S3),
+ SMPL_REG(s4, PERF_REG_RISCV_S4),
+ SMPL_REG(s5, PERF_REG_RISCV_S5),
+ SMPL_REG(s6, PERF_REG_RISCV_S6),
+ SMPL_REG(s7, PERF_REG_RISCV_S7),
+ SMPL_REG(s8, PERF_REG_RISCV_S8),
+ SMPL_REG(s9, PERF_REG_RISCV_S9),
+ SMPL_REG(s10, PERF_REG_RISCV_S10),
+ SMPL_REG(s11, PERF_REG_RISCV_S11),
+ SMPL_REG(t3, PERF_REG_RISCV_T3),
+ SMPL_REG(t4, PERF_REG_RISCV_T4),
+ SMPL_REG(t5, PERF_REG_RISCV_T5),
+ SMPL_REG(t6, PERF_REG_RISCV_T6),
SMPL_REG_END
};
--
2.31.1
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list