[PATCH v11 02/10] pinctrl: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 FPIOA driver
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Wed Jan 27 00:46:17 EST 2021
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 22:19:51 PST (-0800), Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/01/23 13:15, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:32:38 PST (-0800), Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>> On 2021/01/21 17:25, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal at wdc.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij at linaro.org wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Damien,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this looks all right to me.
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's fine with me. The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to
>>>>>> take those as well and I'll drop them? I don't generally like to drop stuff
>>>>>> from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped
>>>>>>> then, that better go to the SoC tree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's
>>>>>> fine. Just LMK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt at google.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Linus,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch,
>>>>> I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch.
>>>>
>>>> It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to
>>>> his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any
>>>> risk of collisions in the tree.
>>>
>>> Sounds good. Thanks !
>>
>> I don't see an actual Ack here, but I'm OK taking it. IIRC there were some
>> issues with the DT stuff as well, I don't remember if they got resolved or if I
>> should be expecting a v14.
>
> Palmer,
>
> Linus sent a reviewed-by tag (see above).
>
> For the dt-bindings problems, the v13 that I sent already addresses all make
> dtbs_check warning and also addresses Rob's comments. The v13 dt-bindings
> patches need review, as well as the clk driver patch. Will ping Stephen about
> that one.
> I will send a v14 only if there are more comments that need to be addressed.
Ah, thanks. This is on for-next. I'll look at the rest, but probably not
tonight as it's a bit late here.
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list