[PATCH v11 02/10] pinctrl: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 FPIOA driver

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:32:38 PST (-0800), Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2021/01/21 17:25, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal at wdc.com> wrote:
>>> On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij at linaro.org wrote:
>>>>> Hi Damien,
>>>>>
>>>>> this looks all right to me.
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree?
>>>>
>>>> That's fine with me.  The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to
>>>> take those as well and I'll drop them?  I don't generally like to drop stuff
>>>> from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up.
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805
>>>>
>>>>> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped
>>>>> then, that better go to the SoC tree.
>>>>
>>>> I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's
>>>> fine.  Just LMK
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt at google.com>
>>>
>>> Linus,
>>>
>>> Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch,
>>> I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch.
>> 
>> It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to
>> his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any
>> risk of collisions in the tree.
>
> Sounds good. Thanks !

I don't see an actual Ack here, but I'm OK taking it.  IIRC there were some
issues with the DT stuff as well, I don't remember if they got resolved or if I
should be expecting a v14.

>
>> 
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research