[PATCH v2 1/4] RISC-V: Do not allocate memblock while iterating reserved memblocks

[Atish Patra]

Currently, resource tree allocates memory blocks while iterating on the
list. It leads to following kernel warning because memblock allocation
also invokes memory block reservation API.

[    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/resource.c:795
__insert_resource+0x8e/0xd0
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
5.10.0-00022-ge20097fb37e2-dirty #549
[    0.000000] epc: c00125c2 ra : c001262c sp : c1c01f50
[    0.000000]  gp : c1d456e0 tp : c1c0a980 t0 : ffffcf20
[    0.000000]  t1 : 00000000 t2 : 00000000 s0 : c1c01f60
[    0.000000]  s1 : ffffcf00 a0 : ffffff00 a1 : c1c0c0c4
[    0.000000]  a2 : 80c12b15 a3 : 80402000 a4 : 80402000
[    0.000000]  a5 : c1c0c0c4 a6 : 80c12b15 a7 : f5faf600
[    0.000000]  s2 : c1c0c0c4 s3 : c1c0e000 s4 : c1009a80
[    0.000000]  s5 : c1c0c000 s6 : c1d48000 s7 : c1613b4c
[    0.000000]  s8 : 00000fff s9 : 80000200 s10: c1613b40
[    0.000000]  s11: 00000000 t3 : c1d4a000 t4 : ffffffff

This is also unnecessary as we can pre-compute the total memblocks required
for each memory region and allocate it before the loop. It save precious
boot time not going through memblock allocation code every time.

Fixes: 00ab027a3b82 ("RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree")

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 1d85e9bf783c..3fa3f26dde85 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 {
 	struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
 	struct resource *res = NULL;
-	int ret = 0;
+	struct resource *mem_res = NULL;
+	size_t mem_res_sz = 0;
+	int ret = 0, i = 0;
 
 	code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
 	code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
@@ -145,16 +147,17 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 	bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
 	bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
 
+	mem_res_sz = (memblock.memory.cnt + memblock.reserved.cnt) * sizeof(*mem_res);
+	mem_res = memblock_alloc(mem_res_sz, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+	if (!mem_res)
+		panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__, mem_res_sz);
 	/*
 	 * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
 	 * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
 	 * care of it.
 	 */
 	for_each_reserved_mem_region(region) {
-		res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-		if (!res)
-			panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
-			      sizeof(struct resource));
+		res = &mem_res[i++];
 
 		res->name = "Reserved";
 		res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
@@ -171,8 +174,10 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 		 * Ignore any other reserved regions within
 		 * system memory.
 		 */
-		if (memblock_is_memory(res->start))
+		if (memblock_is_memory(res->start)) {
+			memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
 		if (ret < 0)
@@ -181,10 +186,7 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 
 	/* Add /memory regions to the resource tree */
 	for_each_mem_region(region) {
-		res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-		if (!res)
-			panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
-			      sizeof(struct resource));
+		res = &mem_res[i++];
 
 		if (unlikely(memblock_is_nomap(region))) {
 			res->name = "Reserved";
@@ -205,9 +207,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 	return;
 
  error:
-	memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
 	/* Better an empty resource tree than an inconsistent one */
 	release_child_resources(&iomem_resource);
+	memblock_free((phys_addr_t) mem_res, mem_res_sz);
 }
 
 
-- 
2.25.1