[PATCH] RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree

Atish Patra atishp at atishpatra.org
Mon Jan 4 15:48:27 EST 2021


On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:17 PM Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr> wrote:
>
> Στις 2020-12-24 01:32, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 1:17 PM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:02 PM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:59 PM Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Στις 2020-12-19 01:52, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> >> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:37 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:24:10 PDT (-0700), mick at ics.forth.gr wrote:
> >> > > >> > This patch (previously part of my kexec/kdump series) populates
> >> > > >> > /proc/iomem with the various sections of the kernel image. We need
> >> > > >> > this for kexec-tools to be able to prepare the crashkernel image
> >> > > >> > for kdump to work. Since resource tree initialization is not
> >> > > >> > related to memory initialization I added the code to kernel/setup.c
> >> > > >> > and removed the original code (derived from the arm64 tree) from
> >> > > >> > mm/init.c.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr>
> >> > > >> > ---
> >> > > >> >  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > >> >  arch/riscv/mm/init.c      |  27 -------
> >> > > >> >  2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> >> > > >> > index 2c6dd3293..450f0142f 100644
> >> > > >> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> >> > > >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> >> > > >> > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> >> > > >> >   *  Chen Liqin <liqin.chen at sunplusct.com>
> >> > > >> >   *  Lennox Wu <lennox.wu at sunplusct.com>
> >> > > >> >   * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
> >> > > >> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 FORTH-ICS/CARV
> >> > > >> > + *  Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr>
> >> > > >> >   */
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >> > > >> > @@ -48,6 +50,163 @@ atomic_t hart_lottery __section(.sdata);
> >> > > >> >  unsigned long boot_cpu_hartid;
> >> > > >> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > +/*
> >> > > >> > + * Place kernel memory regions on the resource tree so that
> >> > > >> > + * kexec-tools can retrieve them from /proc/iomem. While there
> >> > > >> > + * also add "System RAM" regions for compatibility with other
> >> > > >> > + * archs, and the rest of the known regions for completeness.
> >> > > >> > + */
> >> > > >> > +static struct resource code_res = { .name = "Kernel code", };
> >> > > >> > +static struct resource data_res = { .name = "Kernel data", };
> >> > > >> > +static struct resource rodata_res = { .name = "Kernel rodata", };
> >> > > >> > +static struct resource bss_res = { .name = "Kernel bss", };
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +static int __init add_resource(struct resource *parent,
> >> > > >> > +                             struct resource *res)
> >> > > >> > +{
> >> > > >> > +     int ret = 0;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = insert_resource(parent, res);
> >> > > >> > +     if (ret < 0) {
> >> > > >> > +             pr_err("Failed to add a %s resource at %llx\n",
> >> > > >> > +                     res->name, (unsigned long long) res->start);
> >> > > >> > +             return ret;
> >> > > >> > +     }
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     return 1;
> >> > > >> > +}
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +static int __init add_kernel_resources(struct resource *res)
> >> > > >> > +{
> >> > > >> > +     int ret = 0;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     /*
> >> > > >> > +      * The memory region of the kernel image is continuous and
> >> > > >> > +      * was reserved on setup_bootmem, find it here and register
> >> > > >> > +      * it as a resource, then register the various segments of
> >> > > >> > +      * the image as child nodes
> >> > > >> > +      */
> >> > > >> > +     if (!(res->start <= code_res.start && res->end >= data_res.end))
> >> > > >> > +             return 0;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     res->name = "Kernel image";
> >> > > >> > +     res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     /*
> >> > > >> > +      * We removed a part of this region on setup_bootmem so
> >> > > >> > +      * we need to expand the resource for the bss to fit in.
> >> > > >> > +      */
> >> > > >> > +     res->end = bss_res.end;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
> >> > > >> > +     if (ret < 0)
> >> > > >> > +             return ret;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = add_resource(res, &code_res);
> >> > > >> > +     if (ret < 0)
> >> > > >> > +             return ret;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = add_resource(res, &rodata_res);
> >> > > >> > +     if (ret < 0)
> >> > > >> > +             return ret;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = add_resource(res, &data_res);
> >> > > >> > +     if (ret < 0)
> >> > > >> > +             return ret;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     ret = add_resource(res, &bss_res);
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     return ret;
> >> > > >> > +}
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +static void __init init_resources(void)
> >> > > >> > +{
> >> > > >> > +     struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
> >> > > >> > +     struct resource *res = NULL;
> >> > > >> > +     int ret = 0;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
> >> > > >> > +     code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
> >> > > >> > +     code_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     rodata_res.start = __pa_symbol(__start_rodata);
> >> > > >> > +     rodata_res.end = __pa_symbol(__end_rodata) - 1;
> >> > > >> > +     rodata_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     data_res.start = __pa_symbol(_data);
> >> > > >> > +     data_res.end = __pa_symbol(_edata) - 1;
> >> > > >> > +     data_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     bss_res.start = __pa_symbol(__bss_start);
> >> > > >> > +     bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
> >> > > >> > +     bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >> > +
> >> > > >> > +     /*
> >> > > >> > +      * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
> >> > > >> > +      * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
> >> > > >> > +      * care of it.
> >> > > >> > +      */
> >> > > >> > +     for_each_memblock(reserved, region) {
> >> > > >> > +             res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is there a specific reason to invoke memblock_alloc while iterating
> >> > > > reserved regions ?
> >> > > > memblock_alloc also adds calls memblock_reserve. So we are modifying
> >> > > > the reserved region entries
> >> > > > while iterating it. It resulted in below warning for rv32.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> > > > [    0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/resource.c:795
> >> > > > __insert_resource+0x8e/0xd0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] Modules linked in:
> >> > > > [    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
> >> > > > 5.10.0-00022-ge20097fb37e2-dirty #549
> >> > > > [    0.000000] epc: c00125c2 ra : c001262c sp : c1c01f50
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  gp : c1d456e0 tp : c1c0a980 t0 : ffffcf20
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  t1 : 00000000 t2 : 00000000 s0 : c1c01f60
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  s1 : ffffcf00 a0 : ffffff00 a1 : c1c0c0c4
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  a2 : 80c12b15 a3 : 80402000 a4 : 80402000
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  a5 : c1c0c0c4 a6 : 80c12b15 a7 : f5faf600
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  s2 : c1c0c0c4 s3 : c1c0e000 s4 : c1009a80
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  s5 : c1c0c000 s6 : c1d48000 s7 : c1613b4c
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  s8 : 00000fff s9 : 80000200 s10: c1613b40
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  s11: 00000000 t3 : c1d4a000 t4 : ffffffff
> >> > > > [    0.000000]  t5 : c1008e38 t6 : 00000001
> >> > > > [    0.000000] status: 00000100 badaddr: 00000000 cause: 00000003
> >> > > > [    0.000000] irq event stamp: 0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] random: get_random_bytes called from __warn+0xd8/0x11e
> >> > > > with crng_init=0
> >> > > > [    0.000000] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >> > > > [    0.000000] Failed to add a Kernel code resource at 80402000
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Here is the fix that works:
> >> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> >> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> >> > > > @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> >> > > >  {
> >> > > >         struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
> >> > > >         struct resource *res = NULL;
> >> > > > -       int ret = 0;
> >> > > > +       int ret = 0, i = 0;
> >> > > > +       int num_mem_res;
> >> > > > +       struct resource *mem_res;
> >> > > >
> >> > > >         code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
> >> > > >         code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
> >> > > > @@ -145,16 +147,17 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> >> > > >         bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
> >> > > >         bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +        num_mem_res = memblock.memory.cnt + memblock.reserved.cnt;
> >> > > > +       mem_res = memblock_alloc(num_mem_res * sizeof(*mem_res),
> >> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >> > > > +       if (!mem_res)
> >> > > > +               panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
> >> > > > num_mem_res * sizeof(*mem_res));
> >> > > >         /*
> >> > > >          * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
> >> > > >          * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
> >> > > >          * care of it.
> >> > > >          */
> >> > > >         for_each_reserved_mem_region(region) {
> >> > > > -               res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource),
> >> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >> > > > -               if (!res)
> >> > > > -                       panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n",
> >> > > > __func__,
> >> > > > -                             sizeof(struct resource));
> >> > > > +               res = &mem_res[i++];
> >> > > >
> >> > > >                 res->name = "Reserved";
> >> > > >                 res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> >> > > > @@ -181,11 +184,8 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >         /* Add /memory regions to the resource tree */
> >> > > >         for_each_mem_region(region) {
> >> > > > -               res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource),
> >> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >> > > > -               if (!res)
> >> > > > -                       panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n",
> >> > > > __func__,
> >> > > > -                             sizeof(struct resource));
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +               res = &mem_res[i++];
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If this looks okay to you, I will send the patch.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The problem is that we don't want to include all reserved regions within
> >> > > /memory such as the device tree or initramfs, since they'll get modified
> >> > > and/or freed later on. So pre-allocating resources for all reserved
> >> > > regions doesn't seem the right thing to do. My goal here was to allocate
> >> > > a resource on each itteration and free it if not needed / on failure, I
> >> > > free the failed resource on failure but not if it's not needed as you
> >> > > noted.
> >> > >
> >> > > As for the issue of memblock_alloc() calling memblock_reserve(), we
> >> > > don't add any new reserved regions at this point directly through
> >> > > memblock_reserve(), and memblock_reserve() will run on neighboring
> >> > > regions that memblock_merge_regions() will later on merge together, so
> >> > > it'll work on a single growing region instead of creating new ones.
> >>
> >> Forgot to add this:
> >> The contiguous region memory allocation and merging happens for RV64
> >> but doesn't happen for RV32.
> >> Here is a boot log with additional printk messages which clearly
> >> indicate that memory regions are not contiguous.
> >>
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff80-0xc03fffff]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff40-0xc03fff5f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 5
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff00-0xc03fff1f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 6
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffec0-0xc03ffedf]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 7
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe80-0xc03ffe9f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 8
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe40-0xc03ffe5f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 9
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe00-0xc03ffe1f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 10
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffdc0-0xc03ffddf]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 11
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd80-0xc03ffd9f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 12
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd40-0xc03ffd5f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 13
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> >> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> >> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd00-0xc03ffd1f]
> >> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> >> [    0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> >> 14
> >>
> >> I am looking into the memblock allocation code to find out if this is
> >> expected.
> >>
> >
> > Ahh found it. memblock_align is called with SMP_CACHE_BYTES (64) bytes
> > alignment.
> > Using a 32byte alignment solves the memory resource warning I was
> > seeing on RV32 boot.
> >
> > I still prefer one time allocation before the loop instead of
> > memblock_alloc invocation
> > in every iteration (both mem_region & reserved_mem_region). This is
> > happening during boot time.
> > The less work it does, it is better. Let me know if you think there
> > are any downsides to this approach.
> >
> > Otherwise, I will revise my patch and send it.
> >
>
> ACK, we'll loose some memory for the reserved regions we'll ignore but
> it's safer / simpler that way.
> Thanks for debugging this, I guess we'll need a patch for the
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES issue, we'll need a cache.h.
>

yeah. I think defining L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 5 for RV32 is sufficient.
I will send both patches soon.

> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list