[PATCH] riscv: Pass virtual addresses to kasan_mem_to_shadow
Alex Ghiti
alex at ghiti.fr
Tue Feb 23 00:41:52 EST 2021
Hi Palmer,
Le 2/22/21 à 9:58 PM, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:07:34 PST (-0800), alex at ghiti.fr wrote:
>> kasan_mem_to_shadow translates virtual addresses to kasan shadow
>> addresses whereas for_each_mem_range returns physical addresses: it is
>> then required to use __va on those addresses before passing them to
>> kasan_mem_to_shadow.
>>
>> Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with
>> for_each_mem_range()")
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> index 4b9149f963d3..6d3b88f2c566 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
>> (void *)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
>>
>> for_each_mem_range(i, &_start, &_end) {
>> - void *start = (void *)_start;
>> - void *end = (void *)_end;
>> + void *start = (void *)__va(_start);
>> + void *end = (void *)__va(_end);
>>
>> if (start >= end)
>> break;
>
> Thanks, but unless I'm missing something this is already in Linus' tree as
> c25a053e1577 ("riscv: Fix KASAN memory mapping.").
You're right, I missed this one: but for some reasons, this patch does
not appear in for-next.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list