[PATCH -next] RISCV: Add some depends for NUMA
palmer at dabbelt.com
Fri Feb 5 01:58:40 EST 2021
On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:23:43 PST (-0800), wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com wrote:
> The numa feature is useless for riscv32 platform(MAXPHYSMEM_1GB if 32bit),
I'm not convinced of that. There's no reason NUMA shouldn't work on 32-bit, it
doesn't depend on having a large amount of memory just having non-uniform
memory. I could buy the argument that build a 32-bit NUMA system would be
wacky, but IIUC it works now and I don't see any reason to throw that away.
> and it should depends on SMP feature, this also fix the build error,
I can buy that CONFIG_NUMA doesn't really make sense without CONFIG_SMP, as
there's not a whole lot to do, but I also don't see any reason from disallowing
users from picking it. arm64 allows !SMP && NUMA, and I don't see any reason
it wouldn't work just as well for us.
> riscv64-buildroot-linux-gnu-ld: mm/page_alloc.o: in function `.L0 ':
> page_alloc.c:(.text+0x4808): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance'
The only instance of node_reclaim_distance I see in mm/page_alloc.c is already
guarded with CONFIG_NUMA, but the definition of node_reclaim_distance isn't.
I'll send out some patches to add the guard which might make sorting this out
earlier, but I don't see it fixing any failures.
> Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform")
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 22fa17898d29..ac7f5801bd82 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ endchoice
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> + depends on SMP
> + depends on 64BIT
> select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> select OF_NUMA
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
More information about the linux-riscv