[PATCH v2 03/17] dt-bindings: soc/microchip: make systemcontroller a mfd
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Tue Dec 21 09:55:33 PST 2021
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:33:11AM +0000, conor.dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>
> Make the system controller on the Polarfire SoC
> a "simple,mfd" so that the services can be child
> nodes of the system controller node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> ---
> .../microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> index f699772fedf3..014cb44b8f31 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> @@ -13,13 +13,34 @@ description: |
> The PolarFire SoC system controller is communicated with via a mailbox.
> This document describes the bindings for the client portion of that mailbox.
>
> -
> properties:
> mboxes:
> maxItems: 1
>
> compatible:
> - const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
> + items:
> + - const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
> + - const: simple-mfd
'simple-mfd' means there is zero dependency on the parent for the child
nodes. Isn't 'mboxes' a dependency?
> +
> + hwrandom:
> + type: object
> +
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: microchip,mpfs-rng
> +
> + required:
> + - compatible
> +
> + sysserv:
> + type: object
> +
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: microchip,mpfs-generic-service
> +
> + required:
> + - compatible
There's not really any need to have child nodes which have no resources.
The driver for microchip,mpfs-sys-controller can create child devices.
Rob
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list