[PATCH v5] memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Tue Aug 17 17:13:07 PDT 2021
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:26:22 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.ibm.com>
>
> There are a lot of uses of memblock_find_in_range() along with
> memblock_reserve() from the times memblock allocation APIs did not exist.
>
> memblock_find_in_range() is the very core of memblock allocations, so any
> future changes to its internal behaviour would mandate updates of all the
> users outside memblock.
>
> Replace the calls to memblock_find_in_range() with an equivalent calls to
> memblock_phys_alloc() and memblock_phys_alloc_range() and make
> memblock_find_in_range() private method of memblock.
>
> This simplifies the callers, ensures that (unlikely) errors in
> memblock_reserve() are handled and improves maintainability of
> memblock_find_in_range().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shtuemov at linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com> # ACPI
> Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk>
> Acked-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr> # riscv
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> # arm64
> ---
> v5:
> * restore the original behaviour on x86 with addition of more elaborate
> comment; I will address the issue in memory_map_top_down() in a separate
> series.
>
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210812065907.20046-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Add patch that prevents the crashes reported by Guenter Roeck on x86/i386
> on QEMU with 256M or 512M of memory and EFI boot enabled.
> * Add Acked-by and Reviewed-by, thanks everybidy!
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210803064218.6611-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * simplify check for exact crash kerenl allocation on arm, per Rob
> * make crash_max unsigned long long on arm64, per Rob
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210802063737.22733-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * don't change error message in arm::reserve_crashkernel(), per Russell
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210730104039.7047-1-rppt@kernel.org
>
>
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 20 +++++---------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/reserved_mem.c | 9 +++----
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 36 ++++++++-----------------
> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 14 +++++-----
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 44 ++++++++++---------------------
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 10 ++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 5 ++--
> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 23 ++++++++++------
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 5 ++--
> arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 5 ++--
> arch/x86/realmode/init.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 5 ++--
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 5 +---
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 12 ++++++---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 --
> mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
> 16 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list