[PATCH 1/4] tools/perf/arch/riscv: record registers needed for --call-graph=dwarf
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Tue Aug 3 21:22:54 PDT 2021
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:25:21 PDT (-0700), edwin at etorok.net wrote:
> For libdw-based callgraph sampling to work we need to sample registers.
>
> Tested on HiFive Unmatched with a trunk version of OCaml:
These generally LGTM, but I don't have patch #2. Sometimes that means
they're just not targeted at the RISC-V tree, which is fine with me but
I'm happy to take some time to look closer and take them if that's what
you're looking for.
A cover letter can be a good bet, to describe this sort of stuff.
> ```
> # perf record --user-regs=?
> available registers: pc ra sp gp tp t0 t1 t2 s0 s1 a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7
> s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 s8 s9 s10 s11 t3 t4 t5 t6
>
> # sed -e 's/(\*\*//' -e 's/\*\*)//' \
> testsuite/tests/misc-unsafe/almabench.ml >almabench_benchmark.ml
> # ocamlopt almabench_benchmark.ml -unsafe -o almabench_benchmark
> # perf record -e cpu-clock -v --call-graph=dwarf -F 99 \
> ./almabench_benchmark
>
> callchain: type DWARF
> callchain: stack dump size 8192
> nr_cblocks: 0
> affinity: SYS
> mmap flush: 1
> comp level: 0
> mmap size 528384B
> mmap size 528384B
> Control descriptor is not initialized
> 0 17.00 -26.06
> 1 12.34 1.29
> 2 6.83 22.95
> 3 0.04 -1.26
> 4 2.30 12.54
> 5 2.93 14.35
> 6 21.27 -16.57
> 7 20.41 -19.04
> [ perf record: Woken up 65 times to write data ]
> Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
> Failed to open /proc/kcore.
> Note /proc/kcore requires CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability to access.
> Using /proc/kallsyms for symbols
> failed to write feature CPUDESC
> failed to write feature CPUID
> failed to write feature NUMA_TOPOLOGY
> failed to write feature MEM_TOPOLOGY
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 16.265 MB perf.data (1997 samples) ]
>
> # perf script
> ...
> almabench_bench 1193 14816.399235: 10101010 cpu-clock:
> 3fbbd63d54 reduce_sincos+0x268 (inlined)
> 3fbbd63d54 __cos+0x268 (/lib/libm-2.33.so)
> 2aac4b261b Almabench_benchmark.planetpv+0x25f
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4b3e03 Almabench_benchmark.entry+0x12bb
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4b0097 caml_program+0x143
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4e4e3d caml_start_program+0x71
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4e5409 caml_startup_common+0x18f
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4e5465 caml_startup_exn+0x9 (inlined)
> 2aac4e5465 caml_startup+0x9 (inlined)
> 2aac4e5465 caml_main+0x9
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 2aac4afe89 main+0x9
> (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> 3fbbc47b0b __libc_start_main+0x85 (/lib/libc-2.33.so)
> 2aac4afebb _start+0x2b (/home/root/ocaml/almabench_benchmark)
> ```
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at kernel.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa at redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou at eecs.berkeley.edu>
> Cc: linux-perf-users at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Edwin Török <edwin at etorok.net>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
> index 2864e2e3776d..8c9f511e8322 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -2,5 +2,37 @@
> #include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
>
> const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> + SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_RISCV_PC),
> + SMPL_REG(ra, PERF_REG_RISCV_RA),
> + SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_RISCV_SP),
> + SMPL_REG(gp, PERF_REG_RISCV_GP),
> + SMPL_REG(tp, PERF_REG_RISCV_TP),
> + SMPL_REG(t0, PERF_REG_RISCV_T0),
> + SMPL_REG(t1, PERF_REG_RISCV_T1),
> + SMPL_REG(t2, PERF_REG_RISCV_T2),
> + SMPL_REG(s0, PERF_REG_RISCV_S0),
> + SMPL_REG(s1, PERF_REG_RISCV_S1),
> + SMPL_REG(a0, PERF_REG_RISCV_A0),
> + SMPL_REG(a1, PERF_REG_RISCV_A1),
> + SMPL_REG(a2, PERF_REG_RISCV_A2),
> + SMPL_REG(a3, PERF_REG_RISCV_A3),
> + SMPL_REG(a4, PERF_REG_RISCV_A4),
> + SMPL_REG(a5, PERF_REG_RISCV_A5),
> + SMPL_REG(a6, PERF_REG_RISCV_A6),
> + SMPL_REG(a7, PERF_REG_RISCV_A7),
> + SMPL_REG(s2, PERF_REG_RISCV_S2),
> + SMPL_REG(s3, PERF_REG_RISCV_S3),
> + SMPL_REG(s4, PERF_REG_RISCV_S4),
> + SMPL_REG(s5, PERF_REG_RISCV_S5),
> + SMPL_REG(s6, PERF_REG_RISCV_S6),
> + SMPL_REG(s7, PERF_REG_RISCV_S7),
> + SMPL_REG(s8, PERF_REG_RISCV_S8),
> + SMPL_REG(s9, PERF_REG_RISCV_S9),
> + SMPL_REG(s10, PERF_REG_RISCV_S10),
> + SMPL_REG(s11, PERF_REG_RISCV_S11),
> + SMPL_REG(t3, PERF_REG_RISCV_T3),
> + SMPL_REG(t4, PERF_REG_RISCV_T4),
> + SMPL_REG(t5, PERF_REG_RISCV_T5),
> + SMPL_REG(t6, PERF_REG_RISCV_T6),
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list