[PATCH] net: macb: Remove redundant assignment to w0 and queue
Nicolas Ferre
nicolas.ferre at microchip.com
Thu Apr 29 17:32:12 BST 2021
On 28/04/2021 at 21:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:03:08 +0800 Jiapeng Chong wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> index 0f6a6cb..5f1dbc2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> @@ -3248,7 +3248,6 @@ static void gem_prog_cmp_regs(struct macb *bp, struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fs)
>> /* ignore field if any masking set */
>> if (tp4sp_m->ip4src == 0xFFFFFFFF) {
>> /* 1st compare reg - IP source address */
>> - w0 = 0;
>> w1 = 0;
>> w0 = tp4sp_v->ip4src;
>> w1 = GEM_BFINS(T2DISMSK, 1, w1); /* 32-bit compare */
>> @@ -3262,7 +3261,6 @@ static void gem_prog_cmp_regs(struct macb *bp, struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fs)
>> /* ignore field if any masking set */
>> if (tp4sp_m->ip4dst == 0xFFFFFFFF) {
>> /* 2nd compare reg - IP destination address */
>> - w0 = 0;
>> w1 = 0;
>> w0 = tp4sp_v->ip4dst;
>> w1 = GEM_BFINS(T2DISMSK, 1, w1); /* 32-bit compare */
>
> Looks like this was written like that on purpose.
>
>> @@ -4829,7 +4827,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> - struct macb_queue *queue = bp->queues;
>> + struct macb_queue *queue;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> unsigned int q;
>> int err;
>> @@ -4916,7 +4914,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_resume(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> - struct macb_queue *queue = bp->queues;
>> + struct macb_queue *queue;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> unsigned int q;
>> int err;
>
> This chunk looks good!
>
> Would you mind splitting the patch into two (1 - w0 assignments, and
> 2 - queue assignments) and reposting? We can merge the latter, the
> former is up to the driver maintainer to decide.
Good move Jakub, thanks for having suggested this as we are highlighting
a bug!
Best regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list