[PATCH V2 1/3] riscv: Fixup static_obj() fail

[Guo Ren]

How about this, revert the commit and don't free INIT_DATA_SECTION. I
think the solution is safe enough, but wast a little memory.

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index f3586e3..34d00d9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -22,13 +22,11 @@ SECTIONS
        /* Beginning of code and text segment */
        . = LOAD_OFFSET;
        _start = .;
-       _stext = .;
        HEAD_TEXT_SECTION
        . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);

        __init_begin = .;
        INIT_TEXT_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE)
-       INIT_DATA_SECTION(16)
        . = ALIGN(8);
        __soc_early_init_table : {
                __soc_early_init_table_start = .;
@@ -55,6 +53,7 @@ SECTIONS
        . = ALIGN(SECTION_ALIGN);
        .text : {
                _text = .;
+               _stext = .;
                TEXT_TEXT
                SCHED_TEXT
                CPUIDLE_TEXT
@@ -67,6 +66,8 @@ SECTIONS
                _etext = .;
        }

+       INIT_DATA_SECTION(16)
+
        /* Start of data section */
        _sdata = .;
        RO_DATA(SECTION_ALIGN)

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:36 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older
> > branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we
> > just get that commit reverted instead?
>
> Can this please be resolved ASAP?
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab at linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
> "And now for something completely different."



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/