[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Avoid running unprivileged tests with alignment requirements

Andrii Nakryiko andrii.nakryiko at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 20:43:20 EST 2020


On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:29 AM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some architectures have strict alignment requirements. In that case,
> the BPF verifier detects if a program has unaligned accesses and
> rejects them. A user can pass BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT to a program to
> override this check. That, however, will only work when a privileged
> user loads a program. A unprivileged user loading a program with this
> flag will be rejected prior entering the verifier.

I'd include this paragraph as a code comment right next to the check below.

>
> Hence, it does not make sense to load unprivileged programs without
> strict alignment when testing the verifier. This patch avoids exactly
> that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel at gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index 9be395d9dc64..2075f6a98813 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -1152,9 +1152,15 @@ static void get_unpriv_disabled()
>
>  static bool test_as_unpriv(struct bpf_test *test)
>  {
> -       return !test->prog_type ||
> -              test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER ||
> -              test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB;
> +       bool req_aligned = false;
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +       req_aligned = test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS;
> +#endif
> +       return (!test->prog_type ||
> +               test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER ||
> +               test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB) &&
> +               !req_aligned;

It's a bit convoluted. This seems a bit more straightforward:

#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
    if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
        return false;
#endif
/* the rest of logic untouched */

?






>  }
>
>  static int do_test(bool unpriv, unsigned int from, unsigned int to)
> --
> 2.27.0
>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list