[PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: Fix build warning for mm/pageattr

[Anup Patel]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:36 PM Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com> wrote:
>
> Add header for missing prototype. Also, static keyword should be at
> beginning of declaration.
>
> The warning messages as follows (with W=1 build):
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:130:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_memory_ro' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:136:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_memory_rw' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:142:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_memory_x' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:147:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_memory_nx' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:152:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_direct_map_invalid_noflush' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:169:5:
> warning: no previous prototype for 'set_direct_map_default_noflush' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c:97:1:
> warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg at kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> index 289a9a5ea5b5..19fecb362d81 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include <asm/bitops.h>
> +#include <asm/set_memory.h>
>
>  struct pageattr_masks {
>         pgprot_t set_mask;
> @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ static int pageattr_pte_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -const static struct mm_walk_ops pageattr_ops = {
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops pageattr_ops = {
>         .pgd_entry = pageattr_pgd_entry,
>         .p4d_entry = pageattr_p4d_entry,
>         .pud_entry = pageattr_pud_entry,
> --
> 2.27.0
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>

Regards,
Anup