[PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: Enable per-task stack canaries
guoren at kernel.org
guoren at kernel.org
Thu Jul 9 03:28:17 EDT 2020
From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
This enables the use of per-task stack canary values if GCC has
support for emitting the stack canary reference relative to the
value of tp, which holds the task struct pointer in the riscv
kernel.
After compare arm64 and x86 implementations, seems arm64's is more
flexible and readable. The key point is how gcc get the offset of
stack_canary from gs/el0_sp.
x86: Use a fix offset from gs, not flexible.
struct fixed_percpu_data {
/*
* GCC hardcodes the stack canary as %gs:40. Since the
* irq_stack is the object at %gs:0, we reserve the bottom
* 48 bytes of the irq stack for the canary.
*/
char gs_base[40]; // :(
unsigned long stack_canary;
};
arm64: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=sysreg
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
riscv: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=tls
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
Here is riscv gcc's work [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549583.html
In the end, these codes are inserted by gcc before return:
* 0xffffffe00020b396 <+120>: ld a5,1008(tp) # 0x3f0
* 0xffffffe00020b39a <+124>: xor a5,a5,a4
* 0xffffffe00020b39c <+126>: mv a0,s5
* 0xffffffe00020b39e <+128>: bnez a5,0xffffffe00020b61c <_do_fork+766>
0xffffffe00020b3a2 <+132>: ld ra,136(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a4 <+134>: ld s0,128(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a6 <+136>: ld s1,120(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a8 <+138>: ld s2,112(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3aa <+140>: ld s3,104(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ac <+142>: ld s4,96(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ae <+144>: ld s5,88(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b0 <+146>: ld s6,80(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b2 <+148>: ld s7,72(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b4 <+150>: addi sp,sp,144
0xffffffe00020b3b6 <+152>: ret
...
* 0xffffffe00020b61c <+766>: auipc ra,0x7f8
* 0xffffffe00020b620 <+770>: jalr -1764(ra) # 0xffffffe000a02f38 <__stack_chk_fail>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: cooper <cooper.qu at linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: cooper <cooper.qu at linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
Change v2:
- Change to -mstack-protector-guard=tls for gcc final define
- Solve compile error by changing position of KBUILD_CFLAGS in
Makefile
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
arch/riscv/Makefile | 10 ++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 3 ++-
arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 4b0e308..d98ce29 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -394,6 +394,13 @@ config CMDLINE_FORCE
endchoice
+config CC_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR_TLS
+ def_bool $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0)
+
+config STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK
+ def_bool y
+ depends on STACKPROTECTOR && CC_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR_TLS
+
endmenu
config BUILTIN_DTB
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
index fb6e37d..f5f8ee9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE += $(call cc-option,-mno-relax)
# architectures. It's faster to have GCC emit only aligned accesses.
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mstrict-align)
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK),y)
+prepare: stack_protector_prepare
+stack_protector_prepare: prepare0
+ $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard=tls \
+ -mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp \
+ -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell \
+ awk '{if ($$2 == "TSK_STACK_CANARY") print $$3;}' \
+ include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
+endif
+
# arch specific predefines for sparse
CHECKFLAGS += -D__riscv -D__riscv_xlen=$(BITS)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index 8e1ef2c..bda4d83 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
canary &= CANARY_MASK;
current->stack_canary = canary;
- __stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
+ __stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
}
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 07cb9c1..999b465 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_S11, task_struct, thread.s[11]);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_SP, task_struct, thread.sp);
OFFSET(TASK_STACK, task_struct, stack);
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+ OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, stack_canary);
+#endif
OFFSET(TASK_TI, task_struct, thread_info);
OFFSET(TASK_TI_FLAGS, task_struct, thread_info.flags);
OFFSET(TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT, task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
index 6548929..cb4ac65 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
register unsigned long gp_in_global __asm__("gp");
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK)
#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
unsigned long __stack_chk_guard __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
--
2.7.4
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list