[PATCH] RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree
Atish Patra
atishp at atishpatra.org
Wed Dec 23 18:32:29 EST 2020
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 1:17 PM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:02 PM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:59 PM Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> > >
> > > Στις 2020-12-19 01:52, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:37 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:24:10 PDT (-0700), mick at ics.forth.gr wrote:
> > > >> > This patch (previously part of my kexec/kdump series) populates
> > > >> > /proc/iomem with the various sections of the kernel image. We need
> > > >> > this for kexec-tools to be able to prepare the crashkernel image
> > > >> > for kdump to work. Since resource tree initialization is not
> > > >> > related to memory initialization I added the code to kernel/setup.c
> > > >> > and removed the original code (derived from the arm64 tree) from
> > > >> > mm/init.c.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr>
> > > >> > ---
> > > >> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 27 -------
> > > >> > 2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > >> > index 2c6dd3293..450f0142f 100644
> > > >> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > >> > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> > > >> > * Chen Liqin <liqin.chen at sunplusct.com>
> > > >> > * Lennox Wu <lennox.wu at sunplusct.com>
> > > >> > * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
> > > >> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 FORTH-ICS/CARV
> > > >> > + * Nick Kossifidis <mick at ics.forth.gr>
> > > >> > */
> > > >> >
> > > >> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > >> > @@ -48,6 +50,163 @@ atomic_t hart_lottery __section(.sdata);
> > > >> > unsigned long boot_cpu_hartid;
> > > >> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +/*
> > > >> > + * Place kernel memory regions on the resource tree so that
> > > >> > + * kexec-tools can retrieve them from /proc/iomem. While there
> > > >> > + * also add "System RAM" regions for compatibility with other
> > > >> > + * archs, and the rest of the known regions for completeness.
> > > >> > + */
> > > >> > +static struct resource code_res = { .name = "Kernel code", };
> > > >> > +static struct resource data_res = { .name = "Kernel data", };
> > > >> > +static struct resource rodata_res = { .name = "Kernel rodata", };
> > > >> > +static struct resource bss_res = { .name = "Kernel bss", };
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > +static int __init add_resource(struct resource *parent,
> > > >> > + struct resource *res)
> > > >> > +{
> > > >> > + int ret = 0;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = insert_resource(parent, res);
> > > >> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > >> > + pr_err("Failed to add a %s resource at %llx\n",
> > > >> > + res->name, (unsigned long long) res->start);
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > + }
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + return 1;
> > > >> > +}
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > +static int __init add_kernel_resources(struct resource *res)
> > > >> > +{
> > > >> > + int ret = 0;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + /*
> > > >> > + * The memory region of the kernel image is continuous and
> > > >> > + * was reserved on setup_bootmem, find it here and register
> > > >> > + * it as a resource, then register the various segments of
> > > >> > + * the image as child nodes
> > > >> > + */
> > > >> > + if (!(res->start <= code_res.start && res->end >= data_res.end))
> > > >> > + return 0;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + res->name = "Kernel image";
> > > >> > + res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + /*
> > > >> > + * We removed a part of this region on setup_bootmem so
> > > >> > + * we need to expand the resource for the bss to fit in.
> > > >> > + */
> > > >> > + res->end = bss_res.end;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
> > > >> > + if (ret < 0)
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = add_resource(res, &code_res);
> > > >> > + if (ret < 0)
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = add_resource(res, &rodata_res);
> > > >> > + if (ret < 0)
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = add_resource(res, &data_res);
> > > >> > + if (ret < 0)
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + ret = add_resource(res, &bss_res);
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + return ret;
> > > >> > +}
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > +static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > >> > +{
> > > >> > + struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
> > > >> > + struct resource *res = NULL;
> > > >> > + int ret = 0;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
> > > >> > + code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
> > > >> > + code_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + rodata_res.start = __pa_symbol(__start_rodata);
> > > >> > + rodata_res.end = __pa_symbol(__end_rodata) - 1;
> > > >> > + rodata_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + data_res.start = __pa_symbol(_data);
> > > >> > + data_res.end = __pa_symbol(_edata) - 1;
> > > >> > + data_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + bss_res.start = __pa_symbol(__bss_start);
> > > >> > + bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
> > > >> > + bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > + /*
> > > >> > + * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
> > > >> > + * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
> > > >> > + * care of it.
> > > >> > + */
> > > >> > + for_each_memblock(reserved, region) {
> > > >> > + res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > >
> > > > Is there a specific reason to invoke memblock_alloc while iterating
> > > > reserved regions ?
> > > > memblock_alloc also adds calls memblock_reserve. So we are modifying
> > > > the reserved region entries
> > > > while iterating it. It resulted in below warning for rv32.
> > > >
> > > > [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > [ 0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/resource.c:795
> > > > __insert_resource+0x8e/0xd0
> > > > [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> > > > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
> > > > 5.10.0-00022-ge20097fb37e2-dirty #549
> > > > [ 0.000000] epc: c00125c2 ra : c001262c sp : c1c01f50
> > > > [ 0.000000] gp : c1d456e0 tp : c1c0a980 t0 : ffffcf20
> > > > [ 0.000000] t1 : 00000000 t2 : 00000000 s0 : c1c01f60
> > > > [ 0.000000] s1 : ffffcf00 a0 : ffffff00 a1 : c1c0c0c4
> > > > [ 0.000000] a2 : 80c12b15 a3 : 80402000 a4 : 80402000
> > > > [ 0.000000] a5 : c1c0c0c4 a6 : 80c12b15 a7 : f5faf600
> > > > [ 0.000000] s2 : c1c0c0c4 s3 : c1c0e000 s4 : c1009a80
> > > > [ 0.000000] s5 : c1c0c000 s6 : c1d48000 s7 : c1613b4c
> > > > [ 0.000000] s8 : 00000fff s9 : 80000200 s10: c1613b40
> > > > [ 0.000000] s11: 00000000 t3 : c1d4a000 t4 : ffffffff
> > > > [ 0.000000] t5 : c1008e38 t6 : 00000001
> > > > [ 0.000000] status: 00000100 badaddr: 00000000 cause: 00000003
> > > > [ 0.000000] irq event stamp: 0
> > > > [ 0.000000] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> > > > [ 0.000000] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> > > > [ 0.000000] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> > > > [ 0.000000] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> > > > [ 0.000000] random: get_random_bytes called from __warn+0xd8/0x11e
> > > > with crng_init=0
> > > > [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > [ 0.000000] Failed to add a Kernel code resource at 80402000
> > > >
> > > > Here is the fix that works:
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > > @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > > {
> > > > struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
> > > > struct resource *res = NULL;
> > > > - int ret = 0;
> > > > + int ret = 0, i = 0;
> > > > + int num_mem_res;
> > > > + struct resource *mem_res;
> > > >
> > > > code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
> > > > code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
> > > > @@ -145,16 +147,17 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > > bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
> > > > bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > >
> > > > + num_mem_res = memblock.memory.cnt + memblock.reserved.cnt;
> > > > + mem_res = memblock_alloc(num_mem_res * sizeof(*mem_res),
> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > > + if (!mem_res)
> > > > + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
> > > > num_mem_res * sizeof(*mem_res));
> > > > /*
> > > > * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
> > > > * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
> > > > * care of it.
> > > > */
> > > > for_each_reserved_mem_region(region) {
> > > > - res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource),
> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > > - if (!res)
> > > > - panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n",
> > > > __func__,
> > > > - sizeof(struct resource));
> > > > + res = &mem_res[i++];
> > > >
> > > > res->name = "Reserved";
> > > > res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > > @@ -181,11 +184,8 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > >
> > > > /* Add /memory regions to the resource tree */
> > > > for_each_mem_region(region) {
> > > > - res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource),
> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > > - if (!res)
> > > > - panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n",
> > > > __func__,
> > > > - sizeof(struct resource));
> > > >
> > > > + res = &mem_res[i++];
> > > >
> > > > If this looks okay to you, I will send the patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The problem is that we don't want to include all reserved regions within
> > > /memory such as the device tree or initramfs, since they'll get modified
> > > and/or freed later on. So pre-allocating resources for all reserved
> > > regions doesn't seem the right thing to do. My goal here was to allocate
> > > a resource on each itteration and free it if not needed / on failure, I
> > > free the failed resource on failure but not if it's not needed as you
> > > noted.
> > >
> > > As for the issue of memblock_alloc() calling memblock_reserve(), we
> > > don't add any new reserved regions at this point directly through
> > > memblock_reserve(), and memblock_reserve() will run on neighboring
> > > regions that memblock_merge_regions() will later on merge together, so
> > > it'll work on a single growing region instead of creating new ones.
>
> Forgot to add this:
> The contiguous region memory allocation and merging happens for RV64
> but doesn't happen for RV32.
> Here is a boot log with additional printk messages which clearly
> indicate that memory regions are not contiguous.
>
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff80-0xc03fffff]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff40-0xc03fff5f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 5
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03fff00-0xc03fff1f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 6
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffec0-0xc03ffedf]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 7
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe80-0xc03ffe9f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 8
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe40-0xc03ffe5f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 9
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffe00-0xc03ffe1f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 10
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffdc0-0xc03ffddf]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 11
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd80-0xc03ffd9f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 12
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd40-0xc03ffd5f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 13
> [ 0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 32 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1
> from=0x00000000 max_addr=0x00000000 setup_arch+0x19c/0x3fe
> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0xc03ffd00-0xc03ffd1f]
> memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xa8/0x112
> [ 0.000000] init_resources: resvd region memory.cnt 1 reserved.cnt
> 14
>
> I am looking into the memblock allocation code to find out if this is expected.
>
Ahh found it. memblock_align is called with SMP_CACHE_BYTES (64) bytes
alignment.
Using a 32byte alignment solves the memory resource warning I was
seeing on RV32 boot.
I still prefer one time allocation before the loop instead of
memblock_alloc invocation
in every iteration (both mem_region & reserved_mem_region). This is
happening during boot time.
The less work it does, it is better. Let me know if you think there
are any downsides to this approach.
Otherwise, I will revise my patch and send it.
> > > issue is that we call memblock_alloc() for the first time inside the
> > > loop and for_each_mem_region() macro uses pointer arithmetic on the
> > > initial array of reserved memblocks,
> >
> > Yes. We also need to do that for_each_reserved_mem_region as well.
> > Adding that to your diff will be exactly similar to mine.
> >
> > > for_each_memblock_type() macro but it's not on memblock.h anymore OR we
> > > could call memblock_alloc() before the loop so that the array is not
> > > expanded while itterating.
> > >
> > > How about this, does it work for you ?:
> > >
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > index 1d85e9bf7..460cfddb7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > @@ -127,8 +127,16 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > {
> > > struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
> > > struct resource *res = NULL;
> > > + struct resource *mem_resources = NULL;
> > > + size_t mem_resources_sz = 0;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > + mem_resources_sz = memblock.memory.cnt * sizeof(struct resource);
> > > + mem_resources = memblock_alloc(mem_resources_sz, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > + if (!mem_resources)
> > > + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
> > > + sizeof(struct resource));
> > > +
> > > code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
> > > code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
> > > code_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > @@ -171,20 +179,21 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > * Ignore any other reserved regions within
> > > * system memory.
> > > */
> > > - if (memblock_is_memory(res->start))
> > > + if (memblock_is_memory(res->start)) {
> > > + memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
> > > continue;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
> > > goto error;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Add /memory regions to the resource tree */
> > > for_each_mem_region(region) {
> > > - res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > > - if (!res)
> > > - panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
> > > - sizeof(struct resource));
> > > + res = mem_resources++;
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(memblock_is_nomap(region))) {
> > > res->name = "Reserved";
> > > @@ -205,9 +214,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > error:
> > > - memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
> > > /* Better an empty resource tree than an inconsistent one */
> > > release_child_resources(&iomem_resource);
> > > + memblock_free((phys_addr_t) mem_resources, mem_resources_sz);
> > > }
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nick
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Atish
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish
--
Regards,
Atish
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list