[PATCH v4 3/5] phy: qualcomm: qmp-combo: Add preliminary USB4 support

[Johan Hovold]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 09:36:04AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/1/26 2:44 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 04:24:12PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at oss.qualcomm.com>
> >>
> >> Some Combo PHYs (so far only on SC8280XP, X1E80100 and Glymur), come in
> >> a flavor called USB43DP, which as the name implies, features USB4, USB3
> >> and DP signal processing capabilities. In that architecture, USB3 and
> >> USB4 PHYs share the same USB_PLL while featuring separate logic spaces.
> >> The DP part is roughly the same as on the instances without USB4.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> +	case QMPPHY_MODE_USB4:
> >> +		writel(USB4_MODE, com + QPHY_V3_DP_COM_PHY_MODE_CTRL);
> >> +
> >> +		/* bring both QMP USB and QMP DP PHYs PCS block out of reset */
> >> +		/* TODO: disable DP PLL if there are no active tunnels after router setup */
> > 
> > 100 column width generally applies to code, not comments. Comments should still
> > be wrapped to 80 columns.
> 
> I believe this isn't a real concern.. checkpatch certainly doesn't care:
> 
> # LONG_LINE_COMMENT     a comment starts before but extends beyond $max_line_length
> # LONG_LINE_STRING      a string starts before but extends beyond $max_line_length
> # LONG_LINE             all other lines longer than $max_line_length
> 
> (all take the same value, preset to 100 at the top of the file)

Checkpatch is just a dumb tool. The coding style says the preferred
limit is 80 chars unless breaking it improves readability. And that
exception generally does not apply to comments (e.g. unless it contains
a URL or similar).

Johan