[PATCH V3 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
sashiko-bot at kernel.org
sashiko-bot at kernel.org
Wed Sep 2 06:35:24 PDT 2026
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added `microchip,mcp2542` compatible string bypasses schema validation hardware constraints because its fallback conditional block uses a strict `enum` match rather than `contains`.
--
commit c5426cb50d1b23a21e92a69a5197ccb523f72e8b
Author: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst at gmx.net>
dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
The Microchip MCP2542 High-speed CAN transceiver with Sleep mode is a
pin-compatible alternative for the TI TCAN1042.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> index 9f5c37ca6496a..3ed4ce2191201 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - microchip,ata6561
> + - microchip,mcp2542
[Severity: Medium]
Will this newly added compatible string bypass the hardware constraints enforced
later in the schema?
When a device tree defines compatible = "microchip,mcp2542", "ti,tcan1042", the
schema parses it as a string array. However, the allOf conditional block further
down in the file checks for ti,tcan1042 using a strict scalar enum match:
allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
enum:
- nxp,tjr1443
- ti,tcan1042
- ti,tcan1043
then:
Since the array fails the strict enum match, the then constraints are skipped,
which allows a microchip,mcp2542 device node with an invalid configuration to
silently pass dt_binding_check.
Should the allOf block be updated to use contains instead of enum, or should
microchip,mcp2542 be explicitly added to the enum list, to ensure these devices
are properly validated?
> - ti,tcan1051
> - const: ti,tcan1042
> - items:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902132801.22056-1-wahrenst@gmx.net?part=2
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list