[PATCH v8 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: realtek,usb2phy.yaml: extend for resets and RTL9607C support

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Mon Oct 12 23:05:14 PDT 2026


On 12/10/2026 19:37, Rustam Adilov wrote:
> Add the "realtek,rtl9607-usb2phy" compatible for USB2 PHY on the RTL9607C
> SoC series.
> 
> Add a resets property to properties to describe the usb2phy reset line.
> 
> In RTL9607C, USB2 PHY reset line is from "IP Enable controller" which is
> multipurpose and handle activating various SoC peripherals.
> 
> It is unclear whether RTD SoCs have something similar to that so set
> the resets to false for these devices.
> 
> RTL9607C requires the "resets" to be specified so add the corresponding
> if check for the "realtek,rtl9607-usb2phy" compatible.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at oss.qualcomm.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam at oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rustam Adilov <adilov at disroot.org>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.


Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters

There is never "yaml" in any prefix. Don't come up with own style.


Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-phy mailing list