[PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 22/05/2026 17:49, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 22 May 2026 15:45:09 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> Add a base schema initially compatible with x1e80100 to describe MIPI CSI2
>> PHY devices.
>>
>> The hardware can support both CPHY, DPHY and a special split-mode DPHY.
>>
>> The schema here defines three ports:
>>
>> port at 0:
>>      The first input port where a sensor is always required.
>>
>> port at 1:
>>      A second optional input port which if present implies DPHY split-mode.
>>
>> port at 2:
>>      A third always required output port which connects to the controller.
>>
>> The CSIPHY devices have their own pinouts on the SoC as well as their own
>> individual voltage rails.
>>
>> The need to model voltage rails on a per-PHY basis leads us to define
>> CSIPHY devices as individual nodes.
>>
>> Two nice outcomes in terms of schema and DT arise from this change.
>>
>> 1. The ability to define on a per-PHY basis voltage rails.
>> 2. The ability to require those voltage.
>>
>> We have had a complete bodge upstream for this where a single set of
>> voltage rail for all CSIPHYs has been buried inside of CAMSS.
>>
>> Much like the I2C bus which is dedicated to Camera sensors - the CCI bus in
>> CAMSS parlance, the CSIPHY devices should be individually modelled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml       | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 208 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml: port at 0: Missing additionalProperties/unevaluatedProperties constraint
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml: port at 1: Missing additionalProperties/unevaluatedProperties constraint
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml: port at 2: Missing additionalProperties/unevaluatedProperties constraint
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.example.dtb: csiphy at ace4000 (qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy): ports:port at 2:endpoint: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-lanes', 'data-lanes' were unexpected)
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
Frustratingly

dtbs_do_check2 phy/qcom,x1e80100-mipi-csi2-combo-phy.yaml 
qcom/x1e80100-crd.dtb

dtbs_do_check2 () {

echo "checking " $1 " and " $2
make dtbs_check ARCH=$ARCH CROSS_COMPILE=$CROSS_COMPILE O=$BUILDDIR 
DT_DOC_CHECKER=$DT_DOC_CHECKER DT_EXTRACT_EX=$DT_EXTRACT_EX 
DT_MK_SCHEMA=$DT_MK_SCHEMA DT_SCHEMA_FILES=$1 CHECK_DTBS=y $2
make dt_binding_check O=$BUILDDIR DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m 
DT_DOC_CHECKER=$DT_DOC_CHECKER DT_EXTRACT_EX=$DT_EXTRACT_EX 
DT_MK_SCHEMA=$DT_MK_SCHEMA DT_SCHEMA_FILES=$1 CHECK_DTBS=y $2

}

Neither my script nor the Makefile throw an error when the yaml name 
doesn't exist i.e. when it changes.

I really did run the checker - just for a file that doesn't exist.

Feels like a bug I should blame on AI enslopification but, it was me..

meh

---
bod
phy/qcom,x1e80100-mipi-csi2-combo-phy.yaml