[PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema

[sashiko-bot at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The device tree example fails schema validation because `port at 2`'s endpoint includes `data-lanes` and `clock-lanes` which are forbidden by the schema.
--

commit f15340b905d3f2f95e02027798a2eb5d4ed06bf5
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue at linaro.org>

dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema

This commit adds a new base schema for the x1e80100 MIPI CSI2 PHY devices.
It supports CPHY, DPHY, and DPHY split-mode by modeling the CSIPHY devices
as individual nodes with three distinct ports.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f434fb04447f6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
[ ... ]
> +      port at 2:
> +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> +        description: Output to CAMSS controller.
> +
> +        properties:
> +          endpoint:
> +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/endpoint-base
> +            unevaluatedProperties: false
> +            properties:
> +              remote-endpoint: true
> +            required:
> +              - remote-endpoint
[ ... ]
> +examples:
> +  - |
[ ... ]
> +            port at 2 {
> +                reg = <2>;
> +                csiphy0_out_ep: endpoint {
> +                    data-lanes = <3>;
> +                    clock-lanes = <4>;

[Severity: Low]
Will this example fail dt_binding_check schema validation?

The schema definition above for port at 2's endpoint points to endpoint-base and
sets unevaluatedProperties to false, without locally defining data-lanes or
clock-lanes.

However, the example uses them here. Does the port at 2 definition need a
reference to video-interfaces.yaml like the other ports, or should these
properties be removed from the example?

> +                    remote-endpoint = <&controller_in>;
> +                };
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522-x1e-csi2-phy-v7-0-79cb1280fad6@linaro.org?part=1