[PATCH v7 5/6] phy: move and rename Airoha PCIe PHY driver to dedicated directory

[sashiko-bot at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The commit claims to move and rename the Airoha PCIe PHY driver to a dedicated directory, but fails to delete the original source files, leaving them as dead code in the tree.
- [Low] The newly added header file uses the same include guard as the old file.
--

commit 86b6424c6ba53c67472bea2d3d41f8d654e1cb31
Author: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com>

phy: move and rename Airoha PCIe PHY driver to dedicated directory

This commit moves the Airoha AN7581 PCIe PHY driver into a dedicated
directory and renames the files and config symbols. This change is
in preparation for adding other Airoha PHY drivers in the future.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> index f49d83f00a3d8..84062279fa63e 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_COMMON_PROPS)		+= phy-common-props.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_COMMON_PROPS_TEST)	+= phy-common-props-test.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY)		+= phy-core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY_MIPI_DPHY)	+= phy-core-mipi-dphy.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_AIROHA_PCIE)		+= phy-airoha-pcie.o

[Severity: Low]
The commit message states the driver is being moved, but the diff only shows
adding the new files in the airoha directory. It doesn't remove the original
drivers/phy/phy-airoha-pcie.c and drivers/phy/phy-airoha-pcie-regs.h files.
Should these old files be deleted in this patch to avoid leaving uncompiled
dead code in the tree?

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/airoha/phy-an7581-pcie-regs.h b/drivers/phy/airoha/phy-an7581-pcie-regs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..b938a7b468fee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/airoha/phy-an7581-pcie-regs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,494 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 AIROHA Inc
> + * Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo at kernel.org>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _PHY_AIROHA_PCIE_H

[Severity: Low]
Since the file is being renamed to phy-an7581-pcie-regs.h, should this
include guard be updated to match the new filename? Reusing the old guard
might cause conflicts, particularly since the old header file was not
deleted.

> +#define _PHY_AIROHA_PCIE_H
> +
> +/* CSR_2L */
> +#define REG_CSR_2L_CMN				0x0000

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519220813.28468-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com?part=5