[PATCH v3 phy-next 2/2] phy: ti: add PHY driver for TI DS125DF111 Dual-Channel Retimer

[Ioana Ciornei]

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 04:01:53PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 18-05-26, 10:29, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 10:07:56PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On 16-05-26, 09:03, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > > > Add a generic PHY driver for the TI DS125DF111 Multi-Protocol
> > > > Dual-Channel Retimer. The driver currently supports only 10G and 1G link
> > > > speeds but it can easily extended to also cover other usecases.
> > > > 
> > > > Since the available datasheet (https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/DS125DF111)
> > > > does not name the registers, the name for the macros were determined by
> > > > their usage pattern.
> > > > 
> > > > A PHY device is created for each of the two channels present on the
> > > > retimer. This allows for independent configuration of the two channels.
> > > > This capability is especially important on retimers which have more than
> > > > 2 channels that can be, depending on the board design, connected in
> > > > multiple different ways to the SerDes lanes.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei at nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - Use reverse Christmas tree ordering
> > > > - Print a symbolic description in case of error
> > > > - Some words do not need to be capitalized
> > > > - Remove duplicated exit code path
> > > > - Return -EINVAL in case of unsupported submode received in .set_mode()
> > > > - Add a .validate() callback
> > > > - Remove comma after sentinel entry
> > > > - Add a ds125df111_rmw() helper
> > > > - Use read_poll_timeout() to wait for channel reset to complete
> > > > 
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - Explicitly include all the needed headers
> > > > - Change ds125df111_xlate() so that it returns an error if args_count is
> > > > not exactly 1
> > > > - Add a MAINTAINERS entry
> > > > ---

(...)

> > Now that I actually tried to make the change that you requested, I
> > realised that the Kconfig is not following any alphabetical order. And
> > neither does the Makefile.
> > 
> > Do you still want me to move the entries?
> 
> Yes please. I will sort this one later in the cycle again!

I did the sorting myself for the entire TI Kconfig and Makefile and sent
a new version: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260518142026.3098496-1-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com/