[PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema

[Vijay Kumar Tumati]

On 3/3/2026 2:53 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 03/03/2026 18:58, Vijay Kumar Tumati wrote:
>>>> - TITAN_TOP_GDSC
>>>> - MXC
>>>> - MMCX
>>>> - MXA - first time I've heard of this rail, from memory I don't 
>>>> remember
>>>>          having seen this in ipcat when I could do so.
>>> MCX and MMCX are comminly required power domains across the PHYs but 
>>> a subset of PHYs have the dependency on MXA.
>> Actually, it's a bit more complicated on this target as 
>> cam_cc_cphy_rx_clk_src also depends on MXA, which means all the CBCs 
>> connected this RCG do as well.
> 
> Right but that's something to model in the clock-controller then not the 
> PHY.
> 
> i.e. if a clock depends on MXA then the clock controller should 
> represent that dependency - not the PHY that depends on the clock.
> 
> camcc on hamoa looks like this
> 
>                  camcc: clock-controller at ade0000 {
>                          compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-camcc";
>                          reg = <0 0x0ade0000 0 0x20000>;
>                          clocks = <&gcc GCC_CAMERA_AHB_CLK>,
>                                   <&bi_tcxo_div2>,
>                                   <&bi_tcxo_ao_div2>,
>                                   <&sleep_clk>;
>                          power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MXC>,
>                                          <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>                          required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>,
>                                          <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>                          #clock-cells = <1>;
>                          #reset-cells = <1>;
>                          #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>                  };
> 
> So... we may need to add MXA here, probably do based on what you've said 
> but I believe TITAN_TOP_GDSC is the only power-domain we need to list 
> for the PHYs themselves, as what you've described above is a clock power 
> dependency which we basically already capture in the clock controller - 
> absent the MXA - which is apparently always on...
> 
> Sidenote, is MXA required for videocc too ?
> 
>                  videocc: clock-controller at aaf0000 {
>                          compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-videocc";
>                          reg = <0 0x0aaf0000 0 0x10000>;
>                          clocks = <&bi_tcxo_div2>,
>                                   <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>;
>                          power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>,
>                                          <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MXC>;
>                          required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>,
>                                          <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>                          #clock-cells = <1>;
>                          #reset-cells = <1>;
>                          #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>                  };
> 
> ---
> bod
Well, the current upstream clock driver (at least for CAMCC) enables 
these power domains at the min level but they do not scale them. So even 
if we add MXA in the camcc device, they won't be scaled per the PHY core 
clocks. For example, if you are running PHY at TURBO, the power supplies 
may still be at the min level or scaled individually according to the 
requests from other sub systems. If we need this to be controlled from 
the clock driver directly, we will need multiple performance states for 
the TOP GDSC.However, this GDSC enables all the clocks in Titan, each 
with it's own voltage rail connections, so a bit complicated but can be 
discussed with the clock driver team.

Sorry, I do not know about videocc.

Thanks,
Vijay.