[PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema
Bryan O'Donoghue
bod at kernel.org
Wed Jun 3 14:18:09 PDT 2026
On 03/06/2026 21:51, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Actually, one more thing, Why isn't TITAN TOP GDSC here?>>>> +
> If CSIPHYs are true subdevices under the umbrella CAMSS device and well
> described as subnodes, then likely none of power domains are needed to be
> repeatedly described in the children device nodes, since this information
> can be obtained from the parent device by the driver.
>
> Technically 'power-domains' property can be safely removed, I believe.
The policy is to describe the power-domain dependency fully since DT
describes hardware not software architecture.
Also for a very practical reason a sub-devices can probe/run
asynchronously of the parent device being active so in fact we do need
to describe the PDs fully.
---
bod
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list