[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pci: qcom,hawi-pcie: Add Maili PCIe compatible

Manivannan Sadhasivam mani at kernel.org
Tue Jul 7 00:19:06 PDT 2026


On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 07:55:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/07/2026 06:53, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 07:35:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2026 18:36, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 05:38:40PM +0530, Vivek Pernamitta wrote:
> >>>>> Add qcom,maili-pcie as a compatible string that falls back to
> >>>>> qcom,hawi-pcie, as the Maili SoC reuses the Hawi PCIe controller IP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Maili SoC is a derivative of Hawi and shares the same PCIe
> >>>>> controller architecture, allowing reuse of the existing Hawi PCIe
> >>>>> DT bindings.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Pernamitta <vivek.pernamitta at oss.qualcomm.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Dependencies:
> >>>>> - PCI: qcom: Add PCIe support for upcoming Hawi SoC
> >>>>>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260625-hawi-pcie-v4-0-1a578603cd86@oss.qualcomm.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> Squash the patches then.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> But these are two independent SoC additions, isn't it?
> >>
> >> It's adding a single compatible, no? If a patch adding a single
> >> compatible cannot be done without multi-patchset dependencies making
> >> testing by tooling impossible, then probably that work should not be
> >> sent separately or even as separate patch. And I am not saying anything
> >> new because half a year ago (around Kaanapali and Glymur) I voiced
> >> strong opinion about that.
> >>
> >> But really, you do not need to add two compatibles in two separate patches.
> >>
> > 
> > Ok then. I'll squash this patch with Hawi patch which already got applied.
> 
> Applied? That's not what I had in mind. This mentions external
> dependency, not something which was applied. Should be squashed there.
> 

I merged the dependency for 7.3 before looking at this series. So now, squashed
this patch with that.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்



More information about the linux-phy mailing list