[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pci: qcom,hawi-pcie: Add Maili PCIe compatible
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Mon Jul 6 10:35:52 PDT 2026
On 06/07/2026 18:36, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 05:38:40PM +0530, Vivek Pernamitta wrote:
>>> Add qcom,maili-pcie as a compatible string that falls back to
>>> qcom,hawi-pcie, as the Maili SoC reuses the Hawi PCIe controller IP.
>>>
>>> The Maili SoC is a derivative of Hawi and shares the same PCIe
>>> controller architecture, allowing reuse of the existing Hawi PCIe
>>> DT bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Pernamitta <vivek.pernamitta at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Dependencies:
>>> - PCI: qcom: Add PCIe support for upcoming Hawi SoC
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260625-hawi-pcie-v4-0-1a578603cd86@oss.qualcomm.com/
>>
>> Squash the patches then.
>>
>
> But these are two independent SoC additions, isn't it?
It's adding a single compatible, no? If a patch adding a single
compatible cannot be done without multi-patchset dependencies making
testing by tooling impossible, then probably that work should not be
sent separately or even as separate patch. And I am not saying anything
new because half a year ago (around Kaanapali and Glymur) I voiced
strong opinion about that.
But really, you do not need to add two compatibles in two separate patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list