[PATCH v7 05/10] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 14/01/26 09:56, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:39:52AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Some Qualcomm PMICs integrate a SDAM device, internally located in
>> a specific address range reachable through SPMI communication.
>>
>> Instead of using the parent SPMI device (the main PMIC) as a kind
>> of syscon in this driver, register a new SPMI sub-device for SDAM
>> and initialize its own regmap with this sub-device's specific base
>> address, retrieved from the devicetree.
>>
>> This allows to stop manually adding the register base address to
>> every R/W call in this driver, as this can be, and is now, handled
>> by the regmap API instead.
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	struct regmap_config sdam_regmap_config = {
>> +		.reg_bits = 16,
>> +		.val_bits = 8,
> 
>> +		.max_register = 0x100,
> 
> Are you sure? This might be a bad naming, but here max == the last accessible.
> I bet it has to be 0xff (but since the address is 16-bit it might be actually
> 257 registers, but sounds very weird).
> 

Yes, I'm sure.

>> +		.fast_io = true,
>> +	};
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	rc = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "reg", &sdam_regmap_config.reg_base);
> 
> Why not device_property_read_u32(dev, ...) ?
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	sdam->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spmi_ext(&sub_sdev->sdev, &sdam_regmap_config);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(sdam->regmap))
>> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sdam->regmap),
> 
> You have "dev".
> 
>> +				     "Failed to get regmap handle\n");
> 

For the other comments: Done in v8.

Cheers,
Angelo