[PATCH 09/10] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: add the HSIC USB controller

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 8/10/26 5:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The MSM8974 HSIC USB host - a third Chipidea controller with a
> dedicated HSIC PHY on the special hsic_strobe/hsic_data pads - is not
> described, leaving boards with HSIC-attached hubs or modems without
> upstream support.
> 
> Add the controller and PHY nodes. The PHY is a ULPI bus driver present
> inside the ulpi subnode.
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

[...]

> +		usb_hsic: usb at f9a00000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,ci-hdrc";

I see the driver determines whether the controller is a HSIC one by
querying the compatible string of the PHY.. fancy.. would it be
desirable to have a separate compatible for the controller itself, or
is it more or less the same vs a non-hsic one?

> +			reg = <0xf9a00000 0x200>,
> +			      <0xf9a00200 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 136 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 148 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +			assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB_HSIC_SYSTEM_CLK>,
> +					  <&gcc GCC_USB_HSIC_CLK>,
> +					  <&gcc GCC_USB_HSIC_IO_CAL_CLK>;
> +			assigned-clock-rates = <75000000>,

Do you have any docs that would detail whether we can run with the
slower, 60 MHz clock here?

> +					       <480000000>,
> +					       <9600000>;
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB_HSIC_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_USB_HSIC_SYSTEM_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "iface", "core";
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_HSIC_BCR>;
> +			reset-names = "core";
> +			power-domains = <&gcc USB_HS_HSIC_GDSC>;
> +			phys = <&usb_hsic_phy>;
> +			phy-names = "usb-phy";
> +			phy_type = "ulpi";
> +			dr_mode = "host";
> +			ahb-burst-config = <0>;

need required-opps

Konrad