[PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: Document access-controllers property

[sashiko-bot at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch adds the `access-controllers` property to `generic-ehci.yaml` but fails to update the companion `generic-ohci.yaml` binding schema.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: Document access-controllers property ---
commit 53582485218bdac0220f3acaf5124a6d9549f7b3
Author: Marek Vasut <marex at nabladev.com>

dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: Document access-controllers property

This commit updates the generic EHCI device tree binding to document the
access-controllers property for controllers that require access checks.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> index 55a5aa7d7a54e..602241887d995 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 2
>  
> +  access-controllers:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +

[Severity: Medium]
Should Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml also be
updated symmetrically?

When access-controllers are configured for the companion OHCI controller
in the device tree (such as on STMicroelectronics SoCs where EHCI and OHCI
operate as firewalled companions), wouldn't the dt_binding_check validation
fail since generic-ohci.yaml enforces unevaluatedProperties: false?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260816213849.1044073-1-marex@nabladev.com?part=3