[PATCH v9 08/12] clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 top clocks

sashiko-bot at kernel.org sashiko-bot at kernel.org
Sun Aug 2 13:59:48 PDT 2026


Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Using `const` struct variables to initialize fields of a static array causes a build failure.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v9 08/12] clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 top clocks ---
commit 0a378a36878d451d9e58d093344b7ead86ae6042
Author: Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger at gmail.com>
clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 top clocks

This commit introduces a new clock driver for the ZTE zx297520v3 SoC's
top and matrix controllers. It adds definitions for PLLs, fixed dividers,
muxes, and gates used by core devices on the board.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/zte/clk-zx297520v3.c b/drivers/clk/zte/clk-zx297520v3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f9915582f261a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/zte/clk-zx297520v3.c
[ ... ]
> +/* Used for gates where we don't know the parent input(s). Assume general oscillator */
> +static const struct zx_parent_desc clk_unknown = PARENT_FW("osc26m");
> +
> +/* For clocks that are known to use the ungated osc26m input */
> +static const struct zx_parent_desc clk_main[] = {
> +	PARENT_FW("osc26m"),
> +};
[ ... ]
> +static const struct zx_clock zx297520v3_top_clocks[] = {
[ ... ]
> +	/* osc26m division for clk_outX */
> +	[ZX_CLK_OSC26M_D2]         = FIXED_DIV("osc26m-d2", clk_main[0], 2),

[Severity: Low]
Does this code cause a compiler error about initializer elements not being
constant?

In C, const qualified struct variables and array elements like clk_main[0]
are not considered constant expressions. Since zx297520v3_top_clocks has static
storage duration, using them here might result in a build failure.

[ ... ]
> +	/*
> +	 * How does this RTC work? I don't know, the ZTE kernel does not talk to it. The actual RTC
> +	 * is on the I2C-connected PMIC.
> +	 */
> +	[ZX_CLK_RTC_WCLK]         = GATE("rtc-wclk", clk_unknown, 0x54, 1, 0),

[Severity: Low]
Is this initialization also affected by the same "initializer element is
not constant" compiler error when using clk_unknown?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802-zx29clk-v9-0-d05530d85d28@gmail.com?part=8



More information about the linux-phy mailing list