[PATCH v2 3/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add Glymur platform support

Abel Vesa abel.vesa at linaro.org
Thu Sep 11 05:33:31 PDT 2025


On 25-09-11 11:18:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/11/25 10:52 AM, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 25-09-09 14:12:46, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 01:07:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>> The Qualcomm Glymur platform has the new v8 version
> >>> of the eDP/DP PHY. So rework the driver to support this
> >>> new version and add the platform specific configuration data.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 235 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >>> index ca9bb9d70e29e1a132bd499fb9f74b5837acf45b..b670cda0fa066d3ff45c66b73cc67e165e55b79a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >>> @@ -26,13 +26,15 @@
> >>>  #include "phy-qcom-qmp-qserdes-com-v4.h"
> >>>  #include "phy-qcom-qmp-qserdes-com-v6.h"
> >>>  
> >>> +#include "phy-qcom-qmp-dp-qserdes-com-v8.h"
> >>> +
> >>>  /* EDP_PHY registers */
> >>>  #define DP_PHY_CFG                              0x0010
> >>>  #define DP_PHY_CFG_1                            0x0014
> >>>  #define DP_PHY_PD_CTL                           0x001c
> >>>  #define DP_PHY_MODE                             0x0020
> >>>  
> >>> -#define DP_AUX_CFG_SIZE                         10
> >>> +#define DP_AUX_CFG_SIZE                         13
> >>
> >> If it differs from platform to platform, do we need to continue defining
> >> it?
> >>
> >> Also, if the AUX CFG size has increased, didn't it cause other registers
> >> to shift too?
> > 
> > AFAICT, all platforms have AUX_CFG0 through AUX_CFG12, we just didn't
> > need to write anything to the last two so far.
> 
> I checked 7180/7280/8180/8280/x1e/Glymur and they all do
> 
> It would make sense to perhaps spell this out explicitly in a separate
> patch

Makes sense. Will do.

Thanks.



More information about the linux-phy mailing list