[PATCH RFC 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s: add HDMI nodes

Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com
Mon Sep 8 05:48:03 PDT 2025


On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 01:40:06PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/8/25 11:39 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:16:29AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 9/6/25 10:41 AM, Jens Glathe wrote:
> >>> On 21.08.25 15:53, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >>>> The Thinkpad T14s embeds a transparent 4lanes DP->HDMI transceiver
> >>>> connected to the third QMP Combo PHY 4 lanes.
> >>>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>   .../dts/qcom/x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.dtsi    | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >>> [...]
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.dtsi
> >>>> index 4cf61c2a34e31233b1adc93332bcabef22de3f86..5b62b8c3123633360f249e3ecdc8ea23f44e8e09 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.dtsi
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e78100-lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.dtsi
> >>> [...]
> >>>> +&mdss_dp2 {
> >>>> +    status = "okay";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&mdss_dp2_out {
> >>>> +    data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Hi Neil,
> >>>
> >>> shouldn't mdss_dp2_out also have the link-frequencies property?
> >>>
> >>> +    link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <1620000000 2700000000 5400000000 8100000000>;
> >>>
> >>> Or is it something the bridge already negotiates?
> >>
> >> No, it seems like our driver falls back to HBR2 (54xx) ever since the
> >> driver has been made aware of this property:
> >>
> >> commit 381518a1677c49742a85f51e8f0e89f4b9b7d297
> >> Author: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh at quicinc.com>
> >> Date:   Tue Dec 27 09:45:02 2022 -0800
> >>
> >>     drm/msm/dp: Add capability to parser and retrieve max DP link supported rate from link-frequencies property of dp_out endpoint
> >>
> >> Dmitry, is there any reason not to allow HBR3 by default? Is our dp
> >> controller/driver not smart enough not to advertise rates it can't
> >> support, during negotiation?
> > 
> > I don't remember the exact details. If I remmber correctly, there were
> > cases where using HBR3 resulted in a less stable signal than falling
> > back to HBR2.
> 
> A very early revision of that series has a commit message that reads:
> 
> """
> Since it is not every platform supports HBR3 link rate, this patch
> limit the DP link rate at max link rate if it is specified at DTS file.
> Otherwise, the max dp link rate will be limited at HBR2 as before.

Yep. And the platform here means the whole device, not just the SoC /
SKU.

> """
> 
> Konrad

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



More information about the linux-phy mailing list