[PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ExynosAutov920: add PCIe PHY DT nodes

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/09/2025 16:39, Sanghoon Bae wrote:
> Add pcie_4l_phy, pcie_2l_phy dt node for all PCIe PHY instances
> in ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> 
> Add HSI sysreg to control PCIe sysreg registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sanghoon Bae <sh86.bae at samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> index 2cb8041c8a9f..9e45bfcd7980 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> @@ -1021,12 +1021,40 @@ cmu_hsi0: clock-controller at 16000000 {
>  				      "noc";
>  		};
>  
> +		syscon_hsi0: syscon at 16030000 {
> +			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-hsi0-sysreg",
> +				     "syscon";
> +			reg = <0x16030000 0x1000>;
> +		};
> +
>  		pinctrl_hsi0: pinctrl at 16040000 {
>  			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-pinctrl";
>  			reg = <0x16040000 0x10000>;
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 442 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		};
>  
> +		pcie_2l_phy: pcie-phy2l at 161c6000{



Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
If you cannot find a name matching your device, please check in kernel
sources for similar cases or you can grow the spec (via pull request to
DT spec repo).

Plus style issues... missing space.

I would like to see also PCIe nodes somewhere, because I wonder if
num-lanes should not be moved to PCI node (phy consumer) instead.
Current approach feels better, but maybe it just duplicates num-lanes
from the PCI?

Best regards,
Krzysztof