[PATCH 06/10] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings support for Tesla FSD SoC

Shradha Todi shradha.t at samsung.com
Tue May 27 03:44:24 PDT 2025



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> Sent: 21 May 2025 15:07
> To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t at samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.or;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-phy at lists.infradead.org; manivannan.sadhasivam at linaro.org; lpieralisi at kernel.org;
> kw at linux.com; robh at kernel.org; bhelgaas at google.com; jingoohan1 at gmail.com; krzk+dt at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org;
> alim.akhtar at samsung.com; vkoul at kernel.org; kishon at kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de; m.szyprowski at samsung.com;
> jh80.chung at samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings support for Tesla FSD SoC
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:01:48AM GMT, Shradha Todi wrote:
> > Document the PCIe controller device tree bindings for Tesla FSD SoC
> > for both RC and EP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t at samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie-ep.yaml  |  66 ++++++
> >  .../bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml     | 199 ++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)  create mode
> > 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie-ep.yaml
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie-ep.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie-ep.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5d4a9067f727
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie-ep.yam
> > +++ l
> 
> Filename matching compatible.

Okay, will change it to tesla,fsd-pcie-ep.yaml

> 
> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id:
> > +https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=011d92c7-5e86abcb-011c1988-000b
> > +abff3563-f87bc6d1cb527c28&q=1&e=3d0e8e81-bcdc-412b-ba41-5d5936c37c73&
> > +u=http%3A%2F%2Fdevicetree.org%2Fschemas%2Fpci%2Fsamsung%2Cexynos-pcie
> > +-ep.yaml%23
> > +$schema:
> > +https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=dc0b3b6d-83900261-dc0ab022-000b
> > +abff3563-91c2c3470c50d358&q=1&e=3d0e8e81-bcdc-412b-ba41-5d5936c37c73&
> > +u=http%3A%2F%2Fdevicetree.org%2Fmeta-schemas%2Fcore.yaml%23
> > +
> > +title: Samsung SoC series PCIe Endpoint Controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Shradha Todi <shradha.t at samsung.co>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > +  Samsung SoCs PCIe endpoint controller is based on the Synopsys
> > +DesignWare
> > +  PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties defined in
> > +  snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> 
> Drop
> 
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - tesla,fsd-pcie-ep
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: /schemas/pci/snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml#
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - tesla,fsd-pcie-ep
> 
> What is the point of this if:? There are no other variants.
> 
> Also, missing constraints for all the properties. This is really incomplete.
> 

Will add the constraints

> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        samsung,syscon-pcie:
> > +          description: phandle for system control registers, used to
> > +                       control signals at system level
> 
> Where is the type defined? Look how such properties are described - there are plenty of examples.
> 
> > +
> > +      required:
> > +        - samsung,syscon-pcie
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/fsd-clk.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +    bus {
> > +        #address-cells = <2>;
> > +        #size-cells = <2>;
> > +        pcieep0: pcie-ep at 16a00000 {
> > +            compatible = "tesla,fsd-pcie-ep";
> > +            reg = <0x0 0x168b0000 0x0 0x1000>,
> > +                  <0x0 0x16a00000 0x0 0x2000>,
> > +                  <0x0 0x16a01000 0x0 0x80>,
> > +                  <0x0 0x17000000 0x0 0xff0000>;
> > +            reg-names = "elbi", "dbi", "dbi2", "addr_space";
> > +            clocks = <&clock_fsys1 PCIE_LINK0_IPCLKPORT_AUX_ACLK>,
> > +                     <&clock_fsys1 PCIE_LINK0_IPCLKPORT_DBI_ACLK>,
> > +                     <&clock_fsys1 PCIE_LINK0_IPCLKPORT_MSTR_ACLK>,
> > +                     <&clock_fsys1 PCIE_LINK0_IPCLKPORT_SLV_ACLK>;
> > +            clock-names = "aux", "dbi", "mstr", "slv";
> > +            num-lanes = <4>;
> > +            samsung,syscon-pcie = <&sysreg_fsys1 0x50c>;
> > +            phys = <&pciephy1>;
> > +        };
> > +    };
> > +...
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml
> > index f20ed7e709f7..a3803bf0ef84 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml
> > @@ -11,78 +11,113 @@ maintainers:
> >    - Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
> >
> >  description: |+
> > -  Exynos5433 SoC PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsys
> > DesignWare
> > +  Samsung SoCs PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsys
> > + DesignWare
> >    PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties defined in
> >    snps,dw-pcie.yaml.
> >
> > -allOf:
> > -  - $ref: /schemas/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml#
> > -
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: samsung,exynos5433-pcie
> > -
> > -  reg:
> > -    items:
> > -      - description: Data Bus Interface (DBI) registers.
> > -      - description: External Local Bus interface (ELBI) registers.
> > -      - description: PCIe configuration space region.
> > -
> 
> No, I do not understand any of this change. Properties are defined in top-level. Why all this is being removed?
> 

I changed the binding file to include both FSD and exynos which have quite a few different DT properties and constraints. I understand
I should keep the common properties like reg, phys defined in top-level. Will do that.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof





More information about the linux-phy mailing list