[PATCH v4 5/5] PCI: qcom: Add support for QCS615 SoC

[Ziyue Zhang]

On 5/7/2025 1:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 11:15:59AM GMT, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
>> Add the compatible and the driver data for QCS615 PCIe controller.
>> There is only one controller instance found on this platform, which
>> is capable of up to 8.0GT/s.
>> The version of the controller is 1.38.0 which is compatible with 1.9.0
>> config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai at quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ziyue Zhang <quic_ziyuzhan at quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> index dc98ae63362d..0ed934b0d1be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> @@ -1862,6 +1862,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8450-pcie1", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8550", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,pcie-x1e80100", .data = &cfg_sc8280xp },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs615-pcie", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> Why? It's compatible with other entries, so why adding redundant entry
> here?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof

If I use the compatible entry for qcs615 in the driver, do I need to
add qcom,qcs615-pcie to qcom,pcie-sm8550.yaml, or should I create a new
YAML file specifically for qcs615-pcie? Given that the PCIe cores on
qcs615 and sm8550 require different clocks, is it acceptable to combine
them in qcom,pcie-sm8550.yaml?

BRs
Ziyue