[PATCH v2 2/2] Add dp PHY dt-bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 13/05/2024 16:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> dp.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: 
>>> http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,phy-dp.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +title: MediaTek Display Port Controller
>>>> +
>>>> +maintainers:
>>>> +  - Mac shen <mac.shen at mediatek.com>
>>>> +  - Liankun yang <Liankun.yang at mediatek.com>
>>>> +
>>>> +description: |
>>>> +  Special settings need to be configured by MediaTek DP based on
>>> the actual
>>>> +  hardware situation. For example, when using a certain brand's
>>> docking
>>>> +  station for display projection, garbage may appear. Adjusting
>>> the specific
>>>> +  ssc value can resolve this issue.
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  status: disabled
>>>
>>> I think you nicely shocked Rob already.
>>>
>>> Please reach internally to Mediatek or collaborating companies to get
>>> basic training and instructions how to write patches and bindings.
>>>
>>> Otherwise it is waste of our time. Mediatek is not a small company so
>>> there is no excuse in sending such poor quality patches, which would
>>> be
>>> EASILY spotted by the MOST BASIC review.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>
>> I used scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported error and warnings.
>> I am resumbmitting bindings by the MOST BASIC review.
> 
> No, please wait. Who did the basic review of your patch? Who from
> Mediatek? Upstream is not a workhorse to use instead of your resources
> for the absolute basic stuff... This feels such exploiting.
> 

After reading AngeloGioacchino's response, it looks even worse... This
was never tested...

So not only exploiting but also feels like wasting our time.

Best regards,
Krzysztof