[PATCH RFC v3 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: cp110-utmi-phy: add compatible string for armada-38x

[Josua Mayer]

Am 22.07.24 um 17:05 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> Am 21.07.24 um 11:31 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 20/07/2024 16:19, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>> Armada 38x USB-2.0 PHYs are similar to Armada 8K (CP110) and can be
>>> supported by the same driver with small differences.
>>>
>>> Add new compatible string for armada-38x variant of utmi phy.
>>> Then add descriptions and names for two additional register definitions
>>> that may be specified instead of a syscon phandle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml         | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
>>> index 9ce7b4c6d208..246e48d51755 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/marvell,armada-cp110-utmi-phy.yaml
cut
>>> @@ -68,7 +93,6 @@ required:
>>>    - reg
>>>    - "#address-cells"
>>>    - "#size-cells"
>>> -  - marvell,system-controller
>> you miss here allOf:if:then: narrowing and marvell,system-controller per
>> each variant.
I am struggling a bit with the options.

First attempt says: if not both usb-cfg and utmi-cfg reg-names are specified,
then marvell,system-controller is required.

allOf:
  - required:
      - compatible
      - reg
      - "#address-cells"
      - "#size-cells"
  - if:
      not:
        properties:
          reg-names:
            allOf:
              - contains:
                  const: usb-cfg
              - contains:
                  const: utmi-cfg
    then:
      required:
        - marvell,system-controller

This works okay for any combinations of reg-names.

However when device-tree is missing reg-names all together,
marvell,system-controller is not marked required.

Would it be acceptable to make reg-names required?