[PATCH v3 4/7] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

[mr.nuke.me at gmail.com]

Hi Mani.

On 4/17/24 02:06, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:07:02PM -0500, mr.nuke.me at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/15/24 15:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 21:22, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add support for the PCIe on IPQ9574. The main difference from ipq6018
>>>> is that the "iface" clock is not necessarry. Add a special case in
>>>> qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0() to handle this.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>>>    1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>>> index 14772edcf0d3..10560d6d6336 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -1101,15 +1101,19 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>>>>           struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
>>>>           struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
>>>>           struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>>>> -       int ret;
>>>> +       int ret, num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks) - 1;
>>>>
>>>> -       res->clks[0].id = "iface";
>>>> +       res->clks[0].id = "rchng";
>>>>           res->clks[1].id = "axi_m";
>>>>           res->clks[2].id = "axi_s";
>>>>           res->clks[3].id = "axi_bridge";
>>>> -       res->clks[4].id = "rchng";
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
>>>> +       if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq9574")) {
>>>> +               res->clks[4].id = "iface";
>>>> +               num_clks++;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, num_clks, res->clks);
>>>
>>> Just use devm_clk_bulk_get_optional() here.
>>
>> Thank you! I wasn't sure if this was the correct solution here. I will get
>> this updated in v4.
>>
> 
> Please rebase on top of [1] and mention the dependency in cover letter.

I am very hesitant to depend on another patch series. Is it okay if I 
include your patch in v4 of this series?

Alex