[PATCH v2 5/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: add ipq9574 gen3x2 PHY

[mr.nuke.me at gmail.com]

On 4/9/24 15:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 21:08, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> The IPQ9574 gen3x2 PHY is very similar to IPQ6018. It requires two
>> extra clocks named "anoc" and "snoc". Document this, and add a
>> new compatible string for this PHY.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   .../phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml        | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
>> index 634cec5d57ea..017ad65a9a3c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
>> @@ -19,19 +19,22 @@ properties:
>>         - qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy
>>         - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-gen3-pcie-phy
>>         - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy
>> +      - qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy
>>   
>>     reg:
>>       items:
>>         - description: serdes
>>   
>>     clocks:
>> -    maxItems: 3
>> +    minItems: 3
> 
> Which binding inspired you to such change? No, you need maxItems. See
> your previous patches here how it is done.
> 
> 
>>   
>>     clock-names:
>>       items:
>>         - const: aux
>>         - const: cfg_ahb
>>         - const: pipe
>> +      - const: anoc
>> +      - const: snoc
> 
> OK, you did not test it. Neither this, nor DTS. I stop review, please
> test first.

I ran both `checkpatch.pl` and `make dt_binding_check`. What in this 
patch makes you say I "did not test it", and what test or tests did I miss?

Alex