[PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add SM6125 compatible string

Lux Aliaga they at mint.lgbt
Tue Mar 7 13:48:30 PST 2023


On 3/6/2023 14:09, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

>
> On 6.03.2023 18:01, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> On 06/03/2023 13:52, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>>> Document the compatible for UFS found on the SM6125.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they at mint.lgbt>
>>> Reviewed-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka at somainline.org>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>>> index b517d76215e3..42422f3471b3 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
>>>              - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
>>>              - qcom,sdm845-ufshc
>>>              - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>>> +          - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>>>              - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
>>>              - qcom,sm8150-ufshc
>>>              - qcom,sm8250-ufshc
>>> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ allOf:
>>>              contains:
>>>                enum:
>>>                  - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>>> +              - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>>>        then:
>>>          properties:
>>>            clocks:
>> I have to apologize. I worked on a changelog for this patchset but I skipped the subject header, therefore it didn't send, and as I realized this I interrupted the process, leaving the patchset incomplete. I'll retry sending it, this time correctly.
> Happens, next time resend it with a RESEND prefix, e.g. [RESEND PATCH 1/2]
>
> Konrad

Thank you! Will take this into consideration for the future. I received 
this email after I resent the patchset, so that's why I didn't add the 
prefix.

-- 
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/




More information about the linux-phy mailing list