[PATCH 7/7] usb: host: ohci-exynos: Convert to devm_of_phy_optional_get()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:30 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:15 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas at glider.be> wrote:
> > Use the new devm_of_phy_optional_get() helper instead of open-coding the
> > same operation.
> >
> > This lets us drop several checks for IS_ERR(), as phy_power_{on,off}()
> > handle NULL parameters fine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> > index 8d7977fd5d3bd502..8dd9c3b2411c383f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> > @@ -69,19 +69,12 @@ static int exynos_ohci_get_phy(struct device *dev,
> >                         return -EINVAL;
> >                 }
> >
> > -               phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, child, NULL);
> > +               phy = devm_of_phy_optional_get(dev, child, NULL);
> >                 exynos_ohci->phy[phy_number] = phy;
> >                 if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> > -                       ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
> > -                       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > -                               of_node_put(child);
> > -                               return ret;
> > -                       } else if (ret != -ENOSYS && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > -                               dev_err(dev,
> > -                                       "Error retrieving usb2 phy: %d\n", ret);
> > -                               of_node_put(child);
> > -                               return ret;
> > -                       }
> > +                       of_node_put(child);
> > +                       return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(phy),
> > +                                            "Error retrieving usb2 phy\n");
>
> Optional is really the only reason for the caller to decide whether to
> print an error message or not. If we have both flavors of 'get', then
> really the 'get' functions should print an error message.

In case of a real error, both should print an error message, right?

Anyway, I understand that's a three step operation:
  1. Introduce and convert to the _optional variant,
  2. Add error printing to callees.
  3. Remove error printing from callers.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds