[PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: Add QMP PCIe PHY comptible for SM8550

[Johan Hovold]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 02:53:21AM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Document the QMP PCIe PHY compatible for SM8550.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml     | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> index 8a85318d9c92..65f26cfff3fb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ properties:
>        - qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy
>        - qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-gen3x4-pcie-phy
>        - qcom,sm8350-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy
> +      - qcom,sm8550-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy
> +      - qcom,sm8550-qmp-gen4x2-pcie-phy
>  
>    reg:
>      minItems: 1

I don't think I'll have time to look at this week, but I did notice that
you fail do describe the clocks, regulators, and resets (as you also
did for the UFS PHY binding) which are currently different from
sc8280xp.

Please be more careful when adding compatible strings so we get this
right. You should also double check that the differences are really
warranted and not just due the vendor using different names for the same
resource.

At least the reset must be renamed ("pcie_1_nocsr_com_phy_reset", e.g.
drop 'pcie' and 'reset', maybe more).

Johan