[PATCH v7 1/5] PCI: qcom: Add system suspend and resume support

[Krishna Chaitanya Chundru]

On 9/23/2022 7:56 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:29:31AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>> On 9/23/2022 12:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 09:09:28PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>>> On 9/21/2022 10:26 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:23:35PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/20/2022 11:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:52:23PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
>>>>>>>> In qcom platform PCIe resources( clocks, phy etc..) can
>>>>>>>> released when the link is in L1ss to reduce the power
>>>>>>>> consumption. So if the link is in L1ss, release the PCIe
>>>>>>>> resources. And when the system resumes, enable the PCIe
>>>>>>>> resources if they released in the suspend path.
>>>>>>> What's the connection with L1.x?  Links enter L1.x based on
>>>>>>> activity and timing.  That doesn't seem like a reliable
>>>>>>> indicator to turn PHYs off and disable clocks.
>>>>>> This is a Qcom PHY-specific feature (retaining the link state in
>>>>>> L1.x with clocks turned off).  It is possible only with the link
>>>>>> being in l1.x. PHY can't retain the link state in L0 with the
>>>>>> clocks turned off and we need to re-train the link if it's in L2
>>>>>> or L3. So we can support this feature only with L1.x.  That is
>>>>>> the reason we are taking l1.x as the trigger to turn off clocks
>>>>>> (in only suspend path).
>>>>> This doesn't address my question.  L1.x is an ASPM feature, which
>>>>> means hardware may enter or leave L1.x autonomously at any time
>>>>> without software intervention.  Therefore, I don't think reading the
>>>>> current state is a reliable way to decide anything.
>>>> After the link enters the L1.x it will come out only if there is
>>>> some activity on the link.  AS system is suspended and NVMe driver
>>>> is also suspended( queues will  freeze in suspend) who else can
>>>> initiate any data.
>>> I don't think we can assume that nothing will happen to cause exit
>>> from L1.x.  For instance, PCIe Messages for INTx signaling, LTR, OBFF,
>>> PTM, etc., may be sent even though we think the device is idle and
>>> there should be no link activity.
>> I don't think after the link enters into L1.x there will some
>> activity on the link as you mentioned, except for PCIe messages like
>> INTx/MSI/MSIX. These messages also will not come because the client
>> drivers like NVMe will keep their device in the lowest power mode.
>>
>> The link will come out of L1.x only when there is config or memory
>> access or some messages to trigger the interrupts from the devices.
>> We are already making sure this access will not be there in S3.  If
>> the link is in L0 or L0s what you said is expected but not in L1.x
> Forgive me for being skeptical, but we just spent a few months
> untangling the fact that some switches send PTM request messages even
> when they're in a non-D0 state.  We expected that devices in D3hot
> would not send such messages because "why would they?"  But it turns
> out the spec allows that, and they actually *do*.
>
> I don't think it's robust interoperable design for a PCI controller
> driver like qcom to assume anything about PCI devices unless it's
> required by the spec.
>
> Bjorn
We will check the spec once and will come back to you,